has to be one of the best period.... if you put floyds skill set in a fighter in each of weight division... i think you would be hard pressed to name 8 fighters that would convincingly beat him im only 23 and been watching boxing closely for the past 5-6 years but i know a ok amount of the sports history and you just have to give it to floyd.maybe im wrong but.... hes so damn talented....its rediculous supporters and doubters .. state your opinion
One of the most complete fighters ever. I rank him in the Top25 of all time and he's arguably the best of his era (1998-2008).
He still has unfinished business, this discussion means nothing until he faces the top WW's of today, not has beens and not smaller guys.
He's perhaps top 40 of all time in terms of greatness. In a purely head to head P4P sense, the 130 Mayweather rates higher.
whether he faces cotto and the others doesnt change the fact that he is unhuman.... nobody is perfect anyone could lose... the best have lost... either way floyds skills are still insane... to put it into perspective if there was a video game that rated fighters skills on a 1-10 scale ... if the 50 best fighters from each class were in the game ... if you could shift floyds weight to switch him from class to class... he would be top 10 fighters in every class... PERIOD!!! its not an argument that i have enough facts to win.. but someone who knows more about boxing could probably support it
huh? He has yet to face the top WW's, lets step back in reality. First he would have to find the courage to face the top WW's then he would have to beat them . . .the first step seems pretty hard for him to get past.
ramshall is one of those haters who have evolved throughout the years as such: 1998: he's a hypejob (knockout out linear/wbc champ Hernandez) 1998: he wont fight a top p4p/undefeated fighter (kayos Corrales, FOY 98) 1999: he wont go up in weight (beats Castillo) 2000: that fight was bull**** he wont fight him again (beats Castillo again) 2001: he wont unify (spaddy and dorin fight to an ugly draw) 2002: he wont go up in weight (goes to 140, kayoes Gatti, 3rd wbc title) 2003: he wont fight Tszyu (Tszyu quits against hatton) 2004: he wont fight hatton/cotto (both rejects fights, he signs judah, he loses) 2005: he wont become welter champion (defeats last two undisputed champs, wins linear/undisputed/wbc welter title) 2006: he wont go up in weight and beat an atg (beat DLH) 2007: he never fought the best at 140 (knocks out hatton, FOY for the 2nd time) now in 2008: he'll never fight a good welter like cotto...atsch it never changes
last 4 years? mayweather has ALWAYS been the smaller fighter. Hernandez and Corrales were huge for 130.
2006: He wont fight Margarito, tells AM to his face he will fight him, then proceeds to duck biggest pay day to that point 2006: Calls out Winky, only to duck Winky. :blood 2007: Ducks Shane to face the much smaller Hatton 2008: Reason for ducking Cotto. . . "Retired" . . . errr unretires to face the worthy Cotto??? NO, for bogus rematch with Ricky Martin.
He falls anywhere from 30-40 in my opinion - probably closer to 40. In a head to head sense, at 130, I have him number one (above Arguello, Chavez, and Nelson).
Chavez and Nelson give him a better fight than Arguello though, based on styles. I have those two about 50/50, and I favor him over Arguello. Chavez was more active, but less technical at 130, so that's a hard one to call. I should probably see a bit more of him at the weight to judge.