P4P Greater Fighter: Canto or Locche?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by MrOliverKlozoff, Jun 8, 2011.


  1. Swarmer

    Swarmer Patrick Full Member

    19,654
    52
    Jan 19, 2010
    i just wanted an excuse to use the balluev picture(money mayweather edition)
     
  2. MrOliverKlozoff

    MrOliverKlozoff The guy in shades Full Member

    1,482
    6
    Mar 12, 2011
    Boxed! I answered your Angott/Fullmer/Maxim thread properly, you boob. You owe me! I saw you be serious in the general forum not five minutes ago. Step up to the plate, son.
     
  3. MrOliverKlozoff

    MrOliverKlozoff The guy in shades Full Member

    1,482
    6
    Mar 12, 2011
    I'm still waiting.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,987
    22,126
    Sep 15, 2009
    I'm saying locce

    As for top 50? I couldn't say. I've ranked to 30 so far and that isn't including some guys I know are just on the cusp so I can safely say neither are in my top 40.
     
  5. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,744
    88
    Nov 8, 2004
    :lol: Great turn of phrase.
     
  6. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    :goodI just hope nobody thinks i was being that serious with mostof the other stuff.

    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    The man is a legend.
     
  7. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,560
    Jul 28, 2004
    After all...if you've got the skills to make an opponent look like a fool...flaunt 'em..:D
     
  8. GPater11093

    GPater11093 Barry Full Member

    38,034
    91
    Nov 10, 2008
    Canto probably had better longevity. He held the Flyweight title for years. He was the premier guy at his weight for a long time, and his weight was much deeper than Locche's at the time.

    I also think Canto is much more versatile and adatable a fighter than Locche. His offence is pretty underrated and his defence is equally as good IMO, from an effectiveness stand point.

    Despite you being over the top, I actually think your quite right here.