P4P Greatest of all Time, top 5

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by SOMERSETDURAN, Jan 10, 2008.


  1. stuistylee

    stuistylee j.c.chavez superstar Full Member

    1,734
    0
    May 22, 2007
    i think pound 4 pound 4 me means 2 take in the variables like training methods and natural evolution of sports as well as accomplishments, record etc...
     
  2. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    I have analyzed fights before, i have never seen you tell me why meldrick loses, you reason is cuz whitaker tells you he won thier sparring sessions.

    Redrooster is the one that says the camacho-whitaker thing, i just support him and your gonna take it out on me. Either way since when the **** does a sparring session determine who is going to win a fight you ****in tool.

    Eugene hart kod witherspoon in sparring, i guess he would beat him then right.:lol:
     
  3. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    94
    Dec 26, 2007
    Whitaker beats Meldrick due to having the better defense and better long range game. Meldrick had faster hands, but less accuracy on his punches, which wouldn't take full effect on Whitaker because he would keep it at range, landing his jab at will against the less defensive Taylor.

    In other words, Taylor's purely mid-range game with inside flurries doesn't work well against Pernell's long range game and jab. And his lack of defense doesn't bode well against a fighter of Pernell's accuracy. Pernell's defense, however, does bode well for someone less accurate, like Taylor.

    ***.