You think you're being witty but you're actually just making some half-witted statement that has nothing to do with what I said.
Keith Thurman got a draw on one card against Josesito and took a beating throughout the fight. Your opinion on a boxing message board won't change that. Josesito was brought in as a past it stepping stone btw. Thurman was either number three or four at the time Pac fought him. He was "top 3" in the sense that he was miles away from being one or two. Pac at this point is incapable of putting on a performance like Porter's against Spence. Hence, he's fourth.
Berchelt could hold that spot. Russell is better than both but hasn't been fighting. It sure as hell isn't Pac at the ten spot.
The top 5 seems correct, shuffle them around any way you want. Canelo, Lomachenko, Inoue, Crawford, Usyk
Canelo is clear p4p king right now, let me know when Loma/Crawford go up in weight to take scalps as good as GGG and Jacobs.
1. Lomachenko 2. Usyk 3. Inoue 4. Canelo 5. Crawford 6. GGG 7. SSR 8. Pacquiao 9. Estrada 10. Beterbeiv Without too much thought
You aren't a strong reader it would appear. That or slightly illiterate. What I said had everything to do with what i quoted. YOU took the copout son....
Porter looked worse against Ugas than Thurman did against Lopez. Both were back at top level for the respective losses, only difference is Thurman > Porter. Also, Porter is Tailer made for Pacquiao.
It's crazy how still today, with so-called knowledgeable posters, that a loss is still treated like it's the end of the world for the boxer... these guys...
Exactly, it's ridiculous. Look at Gvozdyk, coming off a pretty bad loss (albeit to a beast), he's clearly a top 5 LHW still.
