So let me get this straight. Spence's biggest win in WW is vs Porter and Garcia, hasn't lost to anyone relevant. Thurman is still second most accomplished, with relevant wins in WW vs Porter and Garcia, but lost to Pacquiao. Porter's relevant win is vs Garcia, but recently lost to Spence. Pacquiao's relevant win is vs Thurman. Hasn't lost to anyone relevant. Crawford's biggest win in WW is.. vs Horn. LOL. Yet for some reason, Thurman was "miles away" from being one or two. And Pac, who literally danced around Thurman, giving the latter his first real flash KD in years, "can't put on a performance" like Porter has done. Somebody didn't take his vitamins as a child.
LOL No you're just dumb as hell. Ortiz never won anything, Gvozdyk > Ortiz Stevenson won WBC belt and defended it like 6 times, Stevenson >>>>>Ortiz.
Beating Frampton and Mares/undefeated for a couple years is better than what Pac did, which is beat one guy in the top 5 (or 10) and take a close L to Jeff Horn.
1. Canelo (and you're a clown if you don't have him at 1) 2a Crawford 2b Lomachenko 4. Usyk 5. Spence 6. Inoue 7. Estrada 8. Taylor 9. Berchelt 10. Danny Jacobs
Yes, there's nothing wrong with a close loss to Canelo. He also took D-Chenko and Sulecki's zeros in the last couple and, before that, arguably deserved GGG's and zero and took Quillin's zero. Beterbiev boils down to one good win over a guy who didn't do much other than competitively beat a 40 year old Stevenson. LSC is close as is Sor Rungvisai. Wilder only got a draw with Fury so it's hard to add him.
Are your feelings hurt because both Gvozdyk and Stevenson are much more accomplished than 'da boogeyman' Ortiz?
If you're trying to mimic my posting style and are responding to week old posts from me, I know for a fact that your feelings are hurt. It could also have something to do with one ex-Commie's who you fan out over getting slumped over and the other bounced from the pfp 1 spot.
