P4P used to be sacred domain!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Kevin Willis, Nov 27, 2016.


Page 2 of 2
  1. Reg

    Reg Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,373
    6,926
    Feb 5, 2016
    p4p doesn't directly compare skill. It's relative to their weightclass.
     
    Reg, Nov 27, 2016
    Reg, Nov 27, 2016
    #16
  2. FuMaster

    FuMaster Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,910
    1,063
    Jun 10, 2016
    I guess we all have different criteria for P4P. I always looked at it as if this guy with his skill and ring IQ fought that guy with his skill and ring IQ and both were somehow the same size, who would win?
     
    FuMaster, Nov 27, 2016
    FuMaster, Nov 27, 2016
    #17
    Staminakills likes this.
  3. like a boss

    like a boss Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,554
    8,825
    Jul 30, 2012
    Regardless of the various definitions bandied about, the reality is P4P is a measure of how dominant a fighter is in his own weight class compared to how dominant other fighters are in their respective weight classes.
     
    like a boss, Nov 28, 2016
    like a boss, Nov 28, 2016
    #18
  4. iii

    iii Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,832
    4,093
    May 3, 2016
    Hush now child ...the grow ups are debating....(talking) to you
     
    iii, Nov 28, 2016
    iii, Nov 28, 2016
    #19
    Kevin Willis likes this.
  5. Kevin Willis

    Kevin Willis Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,692
    11,866
    Jan 16, 2013
    Not a good time to be a status quo-**** boxing fan. The winds of change are a blowin' hard and that is being reflected via P4P rankings.
     
    Kevin Willis, Nov 28, 2016
    Kevin Willis, Nov 28, 2016
    #20
    Mr Traumatik and Todd498 like this.
Page 2 of 2