PAC all time top 10...If he beat Hatton

Oh I see! You are basically the 4TH CLOWN i know! JMM beating pac 2x's

I'll try to recall the other clowns who said the same... up to know they can't PROVE it! Probably they are still in DREAMLAND!!!! :rofl

 

BY the way, the so called ONE DIMENSIONAL fighter is now #1 p4p arty :mj and now working his way to top 25 ATG!!!! For all pac haters !!!!:vonnecunt :****off :smh

 

if he is not a very good fighter at the lower weights, can you explain how the hell he became a world champion at age 19 beating the thai champ sasakul who's only loss at that time was from the lineal champ arbachakov but subsequently beaten him.

 

the guy would not understand that.. he's a blind hater and he doesn't even know how good arbachakov and sasakul is... he only knew pac after he beat barrera

 

Top 35 possibly. Which is a great accomplishment.

 

Maybe he is an ATG fighter ...

 

No but he's good enough to be in the Hall of Fame and consideration as one of the best little guys ...

 

If he beats both Diaz and Hatton uncontroversially then he has to be in all time top 20. To get near the top 10 i reckon he has to fight Marquez a third time and beat him by UD or better whilst also beating Diaz and Hatton

 

even if he beats hatton convincingly i don't think i'd put him anywhere top 20, i'm a pac fan but simply put there are just too many other all time great fighters out there..

 

Hell no.

He lost to Juan Manuel Marquez twice, and to a shot Morales.

 

another depressed pacteron who needs prozac and psychiatric counselling...

stop crying man. jmm kissed the canvass 4 times and em won courtesy of a 1 eyed pac. :rofl :rofl :rofl :deal

 

Putting the hater comments aside, I'll argue with even using that logic.

On nearly every all time P4P list I see, nearly the entire top 25 have lost at some point or another. Punishing fighters for losses the way fans do now seems to be a relatively new thing.

Then, on the flip side, fighters get punished in rankings for going undefeated because that leads people to dis their competition- after all, nobody who's fought great comp can possibly never lose. In fact, losing appears to validate how good the fighters were because when, say, Joe Frazier beat Muhammad Ali, that then validates how impressive Ali beating Joe was because he beat a guy good enough to beat him. Then the cycle goes on and on. I firmly believe that if Ali had never lost until the end of his career, people wouldn't have thought the 70's heavyweights were the best ever the way they do now, for example, but that's another argument for another day.

Bottom line is, if people don't like a certain fighter, there's gonna be a way for them to bash him.

 

oH! Found (5th)another CLOWN here! I thought CLOWNS are suppose to be in the CIRCUS only!

PROVE what you are claiming! otherwise you are a CERTIFIED CLOWN!!!!

 

Definitely! 5 World Titles in different weight category is unheard of in Lower weight fighters. Say what you will about Pac but that accomplishment is amazing.

 

This thread definitively proves one thing: *******s love to use emoticons!