PAC at #11 according to boxrec. Does the record speek for itself?

I know I know he should be higher, at least at #2. He is duking nobody beside
Guzman and he beat all Mexicans he could beside Guzman .....ups he is not Mexican .

However if you think clearly, boxrec gives points not due to fighter popularity or how
excited are his fans with his wins but its very valuable measure of the win quality.

So if you beat somebody exciting but who have bad record then sorry it counts poorly.
So no matter how you count, PAC do not have win over Marquez and his wins over Morales
are just wins over shot fighetr with very bad recent record.

Reasumming, the win over Barrera form 4 years ago and recent wins
over Larios and Solis gives only #11 p4p ... record speaks for itself :smoke

 

Domngo you already agreed to bet so stick to it you moron.
You don't have anything else to say then shut up yourself and give
other people a chance to present their point of view.

 

You aready had your deal, now you don't have anything else to say then shut up.

 

Well ... it would be great if you put some substance to the topic, will you?

 

See his unbeaten record, didn't he beat Marquez which was to difficult for PAC?

 

You wanna rater hide in the bush or post under different name than show
your new Barrera avatar in every post, and you speaking about chicken? :scaredas:

 

Yes records speak for itself, he isn't God he retired shot Morales and
he did not beat Marquez, he was schooled by him for 11 rounds.
He did enough to be at #11 p4p by the record book :smoke .

I like him however to be within #3 because he is exciting fighter
and most other guys who have better record are less exciting
or fight less know names.

Again PAC is future ATG but he is not God as you nuthugger thinks.
His record is not as good as you try to convince people.

 

You are his nuthugger but not the bad one. I said his record is poor
in therms of p4p status, Morales wsn't in his peak when he lost to PAc
and PAC even not schooled was beaten for most of the fight or as somebody
said OUT-TECHNIQUED by Marquez. PAC record is really great but get some
reality, it do not warrant him to be #1 as you claim all over.

What I want from you in all my posts is to show something whch
might back up your claims for him to be #1 p4p.

1) So is he really able to OUT-TECHINIQUE Marquez the next time?

2) Was win over Morales the definig win of his career whch guarantee him be #1 p4p?

3) Is he really top notch by agreeing to fight fading Barrera for the second
time so he will have status "ATG killer" like Tarver had or maybe he should
clean up the division and take finally on someone with the belt?

Don't be shy give the answer, if you bak it up I will shut up with
PAC threads for 3 months for free with PAC avatar for one month b
onus regrdlees his Barrera fight.

Can you back up your nuthuggery or not?