PAC at #11 according to boxrec. Does the record speek for itself?

How credible is boxrec?

 

again, if you find a post by me that stated pac should be number 1 p4p, then post it here and i will be owned by you forever. his record is not poor even in p4p standars idiot. dude, seriously, you've been calling me a nuthugger and not one did you post anything that i have said to prove that i am indeed one. how can you prove i'm a nuthugger? because i'm shutting you up with you pac hating?

seriously, post anything i said that will prove i'm a nuthugger, i ****ing dare you boy. and to answer your questions

1. i don't think he will out-technique jmm if ever they fight but i do believe he'll beat jmm. jmm is a great technical fighter. pac will never be a technical fighter. but pac will beat him in a rematch because he does not solely rely on his left anymore.
2. the morales win was a defining moment in pac's career together with the mab win anyone who say that it is not a defining moment is on crack, but it doesn't crown him p4p#1, i've never claimed that, i never will. he MAY become p4p though is both pbf and hopkins lose their next fights and pac beats mab, jmm and either the winner of guzman soto
3. belts ain't worth ****. i wanted him to fight soto, you can dig some of my posts and see that i was pushing for that but the mab fight is ok. it won't move him to number #1p4p even if he ktfo's mab in 5 secs which he won't. i'm happy that pac is fighting mab rather than belt holder mzonke freaking fana! the mab fight makes sense. high reward \, relatively low risk

dude, dig some of my posts to prove i'm a nuthugger, i dare you.

 

take the 6 month bet domngo.

 

Manny Pacquiao is a bum and he has fought nothing but bums. I'm jokeing of course. Computers can't judge talant and skill just stats. For this reason I wouldn't read much in to boxrec's rankings.

 

Who said pac is God brainless?:rasta

 

wtf are you talkin about?!

 

Damn . . . I love that list. :yep

Cris John is rated higher than Hatton, Calzaghe, Taylor and Mosley. Then Chirstian Mijares is rated higher than Pacquiao, Marquez and Cotto.

:bart :rofl :-( :huh :verysad

 

hehehe...did someone take this seriously?

 

the only way i can make sense of this is that pacman didnt get much credit for beating morales in the rematch because he was coming off a loss and wasnt ranked very high on the p4p list since it was a lopsided loss. combined that with the fact that pacman recently lost to morales, the rematch win probably didnt do much for pacman. the third fight morales was coming off of two losses and one by ko so certainly pac didnt get much credit for that as well. larios was also coming off a ko loss and was moving up two weight classes. i didnt know who solis was when he fought pac and still dont know who he is. finally, im assuming the mab win isnt factored in so much now because it happened four years ago.

 

I bet you are 16 years old.