pac beats trinidad at 147? you gotta be kidding me!

If Pac has the right socks and gloves he might win....

















































Some rounds before getting ktfo.

 

exactly when has mosley ever ran for his life, he hadnt even been knocked down in years

 

atsch

 

You forget about not getting any leg cramps.:rofl

 

Stop smoking crack.

Are you serious or is this a joke? de la Hoya was a DEAD man walking on the night of the Pacquiao fight. Using this as an example of why Pacquiao beats Tito only demonstrates your IGNORANCE of the sport.

Lol.

- Pacquiao only knows how to fight one way and, unfortunately for him, Pacquiao's lateral movenment doesn't give Tito anywhere near as many problems as you might think. Trinidad still has the height and reach - which means that Pacquaio has to come inside of Trinidad's range to land. Seeing as Pacquaio doesn't have a jab to speak of, I don't see that working out all too well for him.

- Pacquiao has not fought a true puncher above 130lbs except for maybe an old shot-to-pieces Shane Mosley. This is a FACT. If Trinidad lands the left hook clean then it's lights out.

- Everyone who put Trinidad down got BRUTALLY KO'ed except for Hopkins, Jones and Reid. Reid was mercifully let off the hook in that fight and Trinidad was way past it for Jones fighting @ LHW.

- As to the rest of your nonsensical points I will say that Pacqiuao's volume punching and hand speed will only create openings for a deadly accurate puncher like Tito to exploit. Kryptonite for a Southpaw is the straight right hand and Tito's is almost as deadly as his left hook.

Trinidad KO6 Pacquiao

 

Lo ****ing l.

It took Bernard Hopkins eleven rounds to put Tito down and out. Are we supposed to believe a featherweight can match that feat?

GTFOOH....

 

Pac vs DLH is the worst comparison ever.

DLH weighed less than Pac in the ring.

DLH hasnt weighed 147 in the ring since probably would he started professionally.

 

This content is protected

 

I will go against my better judgement and try to reason with a hater.

Over-simplistic.
ODLH was only "dead" after Pac murdered him. I bet you were one of those idiots who thought ODLH would KO Pac with the jab.
David Diaz was murdered in the same way, i.e. "with discipline".
And apparently, you don't read well, because nobody said that that was the template to beat Tito.
I even agreed with you that ODLH was shot.
It was only to showcase that if Pac really would want to, he can fight without brawling.
But hey, that's too much for you to handle.

Watch Pac-Cotto again.
Did Pac needed a jab to effectively shut Cotto's?
Timing + handspeed + lateral movement beats height and reach advantage all the time.
And you actually believe that Pac will need to lunge in because Tito will be waiting there and not coming to Pac?
YDKSAB.:rofl

Cotto: 37-2, 30 WINS BY KO. 81% KO percentage.
Clottey: 36-4, 21 WINS BY KO. 58% KO percentage.
Margarito (who was nearly 20lbs heavier): 38-8, 27 WINS BY KO, 71% KO percentage
Mosley: 46-7, 39 WINS BY KO, 83% KO percentage.

Marquez: 53-6, 39 WINS BY KO, 73% KO percentage.
Hatton: 45-2, 32 WINS BY KO, 71% KO percentage.

You're right. Everyone Pac fought at WW and above were light handed. :rofl
Even Clottey's and Margarito's KO percentage is decent.
YDKSAB.

Care to remember HOW they were "BRUTALLY KO'd"?
Yep, nowhere near Pac's style.

Yes because EVERYBODY has been exploiting those openings.
Tito's straight right is **** compared to Pac's lead left. I mean ****.
You do understand that every orthodox fighter's KRYPTONITE is the soutpaw stance' left straight, right?
YDKSAB.:rofl

Right, you go tell that to yourself while you make yourself believe that blacks hail from the same bloodlines as ancient ruling-class Egyptians.

 

It was only made to highlight that Pac CAN fight a disciplined fight.
Something he CLEARLY lacks and which will spell his doom when he decides to go all ballsy against Tito.

Ask yourself this, how many times did he go toe to toe against ODLH?
ZERO.
That was even after he and Roach confirmed that ODLH was shot to pieces.

 

Its easy to look like a master boxer against an opponent who refuses to pull the trigger. Pac could overwhelm Tito with his speed but at the same time Tito's timing and accuracy were beautifully precise...a huge advantage against a reckless speedy volume puncher.

 

I agree with that.
But do note that even though Pac and Roach knew they had ODLH, Pac stuck to the plan and never went all out, even when ODLH was covering up himself and not fighting back on the ropes.
Again, I want to highlight "discipline" here, not skills.

Which is why, as I've said, Tito will probably KO Pac with a hook to the body.
A well-timed hook that he must unleash while Pac is throwing a combination.
But TBH I don't think Tito has shown us too much of that.

I only said that it's stupid to think that Pac wouldn't put up a decent fight against Tito due to the style matchup.
Pac is excellent in countering come-forward fighters.
Heck he even had more success in countering JMM than in being aggressive against him.

 

You must be smoking some good drugs over there.

LOL.

Cotto isn't half the fighter Tito was. EVERYBODY knows that you need a GOOD JAB in order to beat Tito. Everybody, that is, except for YOU. Too bad Pacquiao doesn't have one.

The first time Pacquiao tastes Trinidad's power he'd be running for dear life.

BTW, 2009 Cotto doesn't go 6 rounds with Tito @ 147.

How many one punch KO's do the guys listed above have? NOBODY on that list is a true puncher. Stop deluding yourself.

Ancient Egypt = Black Africa

You had better get used to the idea.

 

Did Manny really blame a loss on socks?

 

Yes.