Pac-Bradley, no vada testing!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by divac, Feb 13, 2014.

  1. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2007
    Messages:
    27,095
    Likes Received:
    980
    Balcquiaos going to be so juiced up Freddy's going to fail the drug test too
     
  2. markq

    markq Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    20,453
    Likes Received:
    7
    I find it suspicious Pac is the only high profile boxer on 24/7 who was never filmed by the HBO crew when testers showed up. Pac's camp, of all people, would have made a big deal of it. All we have are the words of a lab paid by Arum that Pac did.
     
  3. iceman71

    iceman71 WBC SILVER Champion Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    51,687
    Likes Received:
    23
    "extra" testing threads are beyond boring. they aren't mandatory and now people ***** if they dont volunteer to certain ones. yawn
     
  4. Overhill

    Overhill Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    Messages:
    6,960
    Likes Received:
    5
    Good riddance.
    Hopefully VADA dies and USADA fcks off as well from boxing.
     
  5. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    26,774
    Likes Received:
    8
    This just doesnt make any sense??

    Why shy away from testing now?

    So you thought marquez was juiced but not bradley? ok thats fine but how come he got mad when Mayweather thought he was juiced?? its the same thing. Marquez had no pior reports of any just like pac, Pac just had suspision just like mayweather did!! Pac is a hyprocite and im very pissed that he went thru all this for all these years. could've just did the testing with Mayweather 4 years ago. Now u do it for rios, now not for bradley?? WHAT A PUNK!!
     
  6. tonys333

    tonys333 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    0
    did no one in this thread read the article its just full of *****s bitching like little girls it clearly said NSAC will test for the same substances as VADA. if Bradley was fine with this same testing for the Marquez fight why should he have a problem with It for the Pac fight it also says We are working with the athletic commission in Nevada and they say that VADA is not a state agency so they want us to run the testing through themselves but if they do that it will be the same tests as VADA.". so by the sounds of this it will still be random testing so stop your moaning ***s. an if it is ok for Marquez to use NSAC why is it not fine for Pac hypocrites.
     
  7. VBOX

    VBOX JOURNEYMAN Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2012
    Messages:
    5,733
    Likes Received:
    3,881
    Great. I hope they both come extra juiced. Should be a good one this time.
     
  8. purephase

    purephase Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2011
    Messages:
    10,740
    Likes Received:
    89
    The thing is most people, especially Pacquiao fans, did have a problem with Marquez using NSAC for the Bradley fight and jumped all over him for it. If we're treating NSAC just as good VADA now, surely it deserves similar deference then as well.
     
  9. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    26,774
    Likes Received:
    8
    Sure does :good
     
  10. tonys333

    tonys333 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    0
    well they shouldn't of had a problem if both fighters were happy with the testing that was fine by me. An the thing is though its not like its not going to be no random testing for this fight so I don't see a problem Bradley got his testing done by the NSAC in his last fight and he doesn't have problem using them again so the fans shouldn't have a problem.
     
  11. texboxing00

    texboxing00 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2010
    Messages:
    7,152
    Likes Received:
    18

    Bradley was not fine with it, he said he was not and only did it so he wouldn't loose his boxing license.

    *******s made a huge deal and up roar and found it as fool proof that jmm was roiding because would not do vada. So this is why thread is made, because pac had just said how he now supportd osdt and believes its needed. However now he is backtracking.

    Its *******s being hypocrites because they flamed jmm for same thing .

    Any who I dont think its a big deal, if both agree then who cares. But it does make *******s look very dumb.
     
  12. tonys333

    tonys333 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    0
    how is Pac back tracking on osdt if they are still using the same methods Vada do. So it will still be osdt because it is still random testing that's why I don't see a problem. An also am sure this is Arums choice an Pac would have excepted Vada anyways. But I agree you can't call Marquez for using it an then defend Pac but I didn't have a problem with Marquez not been tested by vada that why I don't have a problem with this.
     
  13. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    31,154
    Likes Received:
    2,108
    I have no problem with the NSAC overseeing the testing, but as far as Bradley is concerned he was'nt ok with it for the Marquez fight and all of a sudden he's fine and dandy with whatever honest Bob say's should test.
     
  14. tonys333

    tonys333 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2012
    Messages:
    1,166
    Likes Received:
    0
    I new wasn't fine at the start when he wanted Vada to do the testing but I fought he was ok with it by the end. An has it no crossed your mind that he is now fine with it because he used the NSAC in his last fight an he has seen how they conduct themselfs an is happy with how they work because that makes sense to me.
     
  15. boyschoir

    boyschoir Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2011
    Messages:
    3,662
    Likes Received:
    0