No it wasn't, it was a close bout which could have gone either way I had it 6-5-1. Many had it 7-5 Pac, 7-5 Bradley, 6-6 etc etc. Not a robbery. Close match
WTF were you guys watching? Bradley KTFO Pac on the first round courtesy of his laser accurate, brick-like, arm punching to the gloves and arms of Pac. Even if Pac didn't get KO'd, arm punches to the gloves and arms adds like 2 points. So it's 12-9 every single round for Bradley, assuming it went the distance. Not likely though, since Pac was all busted and wobbly already since round 1. Bradley KTFO1 Pac.
i nearly had that, when i saw Bradley hit him with that vicious left hook in round 14 i saw Freddie Roach try to throw the towel in but his hand was shaking so he missed i call for a rematch!
This thread is just as ******ed as the Pac vs JMM 3 thread by Lester. Both were cases of robberies. Plus in both fights Pac was given more credit than what he actually did. He won the Bradley fight but not by the wide margin that is unofficially stated. And he lost the Jmm 3 fight but was given the decision. Bob Arum to JMM, "It's just business!" And that folks is all she wrote.
Robbery, or close to it depending on ones' standards of what constitutes a robbery. I had it 9-3 Pacquiao. 7-5 Pacquiao is the closest I could possibly see it.
SOurce for the people that scored it like you say or STFU you ******. As we all know you are a ***** and are anti Pac. So what ever you think on the matter means Diddley, and YDKSAB