Pac/Bradley: what was the judges motive?

That isn't the same. The overwhelming majority of those 100K would have had no knowledge of astronomy and any "opinion" they had was the mere adoption of the common consensus.

Conversely, press row watched the fight just as closely as the judges did and came to a very different conclusion.

If you asked 260 people living on the same block that you were travelling to what the temperature was like and 250 said freezing and 10 said searing hot would you take your sweaters or your boardshorts?

 

This is the mother ****er I'm talkin about bein down with the GAY AGENDA that robbed Pac.

He's always postin a picture of a man gettin his ass licked out by another man.

Gay as ****.

This mother ****er is from the gayest spot I've ever been, SAN DIEGO.

That **** is gay as hell.

 

I had it 8-4 for Pacquiao. It was a clear robbery and there's no way Pacquiao won less than 7 rounds, no matter how subjective the opinion can be, I just don't see it. Honestly, no way Bradley won that fight and no way it could have been a draw.

 

Judges had the audacity to to score Bradley's clean, clearly scoring shots, and acknowledge his defense was making Pac create plenty of AC. No video analysis of this fight shows a robbery. This fight shows the biases in boxing that there was more outrage over a close competitive fight, then there was over Pac Vs Marquez 2 & 3, where a guy was clearly robbed. People can cry all they want. Bradley marks up when he gets hit. He hadn't a blemish on his face. Stop crying about Pac getting outboxed by a guy with two bad wheels, and move on.

 

It was 7-5 for pacman. The fight was alot closer than most *******s had it. Pacman was on cruise control the second half of fight and Bradley wanted it more andvwas tryingore.

 

Almost 100% of the boxing experts had the fight for Pac. When one of the judges was interviewed on HBO, they showed one round where Pac landed 2 punches to Bradley's one. That judge said that boxing fans do not know how to score a fight. Well..............I read that that judge resigned.

Wonder if Void told his judges to give the fight to Bradley?

 

thats what i was thinking too. Bob told the judges to lose pacquiao in their first fight. If bradley lost in that fight which everybody saw it legally then there would be no more second fight and no money coming in. (mafia style)

 

Betting.

 

You mean this? :smh That's Pac licking Bob Arum's bung. Don't hate me bro, follow in the footsteps of your idol.

 

i had it 8-4 pac..and im being generous to bradley... this is one fight that i didnt even see a higlight or a solid punch landed from the winner.. i looked for everywhere.. i just cant find one ...

 

I personally think some of the bias is racially motivated. The fight wasn't anything close to a robbery...