I can't take these people seriously who keep on repeating that Bradley won 6 rounds, 8 rounds, or that it was close. I'm led to believe that they're either playing some message board game or they know absolutely nothing about the sport, maybe both. Either way, they're pathetic and insignificant.
Seriously, how the **** can anyone say Bradley won? What fight were you watching? A draw would've been controversial enough, but to say he won? Are you ****ing kidding me? **** compubox, just watch the ****ing fight! At NO point was Bradley in control. I thought he won 3 rounds at best!
Round 1, then 5 from the last 6. Pacquiao did **** all in the second half of the fight. Bradley controlled it with his solid jab, impressive combinations and by working harder. I was literally sitting there thinking 'what the **** is Pacquiao doing, this isn't over!' Thought he had it won, as did the fans, as did the commentators.
I'm a huge PAC fan but the loss in the judges' scorecards didn't affect me at all. I'm not sad at the same time not happy. For the record, I have PAC winning 9-3 or maybe 8-4.
Bradley Round 1 (Clear) Bradley Round 2 (Clear) Pacquiao Round 3 (Close) Pacquiao Round 4 (Very Clear) Pacquiao Round 5 (Very Clear) Pacquiao Round 6 (Very Clear) Pacquiao Round 7 (Very Clear) Pacquiao Round 8 (Close) Bradley Round 9 (Close) Bradley Round 10 (Clear) Pacquiao Round 11 (Clear) Bradley Round 12 (Clear) 7-5 Pac But when Bradley was Hurt 3 times during the fight and in the six reallly bad it was a clear fight Pac's way. 115-113 Pac
So you woke up watched the 10th round and went back to sleep, and missed the actual fight, Pacs done has no footwork.
Ironically enough Pac lost both the 5th and 7th on the judges' cards (only 1 judge gave him the 5th, none the 7th). That might be the clearest indication that it was closer to a fix than incompetence- those rounds really weren't close at all, and they were the difference between Pac winning and losing officially.