Fact is that 90+% of those that saw it thought Pac won, and that includes 94% of press row, who are about as close to ringside as anyone, and follow boxing. Tyson-Douglas - Ken Morita had Tyson ahead at 87-86 and judge Masakazu Uchida had it even at 86-86. Total disgrace. Within the last year, we had some stinkers too: Donaire-Vazquez - Dr. Ruben Garcia had Donaire behind 112-115 in what was obviously a Donaire victory. Campillo-Cloud - Judge David Robertson 110-116 and judge Joel Elizondo 112-114 both gave it to Cloud when everyone else thought Campillo won. I mentioned how Duane Ford had Foreman only down one point to Moorer (I challenge anyone to re-score that fight and have Foreman down only one point after 9), and had Juan Diaz ahead of Juan Manuel Marquez going into the round that Marquez stopped him, which was total garbage. Marquez landed such clean crisp hard pinpoint shots throughout. C.J. Ross had Holt-Tackie 5-5 a draw when the other two judges had Holt winning 8-2. She had Burgos-Cruz 5-5 when the other two had it 8-2 and 7-3 Burgos. When you get two judges together who can be way off reality, then weird things can happen. I agree with Kellerman that this was just a really weird statistical anomaly. Plus I think a lot of Vegas judges bend over backwards to keep fights close on the cards or try to seem "fair" so they make the fight come down to the last few rounds, which most agree Pac fell off a bit in those rounds, so that cost him, although Bradley didn't do much either. Basically, no matter how well you do in the first 6, those judges are going to have it close coming into the late rounds. Just ask Oscar de la Hoya and Felix Trinidad. Jerry Roth had Trinidad winning that one. When you get these types of judges together who can have weird scores, then you can have a fight with a result like this.