Pac-Cotto II at a catchweight of 148 for the 154 Title. Is it Moral?

Lounge. Not General forum or can you not read?

 

This about boxing you pedo loser.

Show me one instance where you made me look like a fool while talking about boxing.

You said it happened countless times you should be able to give me an example.

 

We can also debate about how good your mother was in bed last night, but what happens behind close doors should stay right there.........:rofl:rofl Tell her I said :hi:

 

Its manny cherry picking his opponents again. why the f**k would he wanna fight cotto again? between manny and freddy cherry picking their opponents and bob arum tryin to keep it stricktly 'top rank' the whole thing makes me sick.

if manny fights cotto again, he will lose a ton of credibility from anyone who isnt a *******. also, it wont be at 154, it will be for the 154 title but manny will make him come to a 148-150 catchweight, just like he did for the 147 belt.

 

Troll much?

When you stop, Ill show you.

 

Show me one example(i surely cant remember one) or admit it never happened.

And i wont bother you again.

 

Okay okay.

It never happened.

:roll:


Stop trolling me.

 

Oh am I a ******* again this week? Nevermind, someone will be along in a few days to call me a ***** again. Such are the perils of maintaining a non-fanboy opinion on ESB these days...

 

**** catchweights

 

their is no way Arum agrees to Pac- Cotto at 154

 

you should not be able to win world titles at a catch weight.the fighters should have to make 154 for the 154 title to be on the line.all this catch weight **** needs to stop.how are you a champ in so many weight classes and you never even fought at that weight ? its always a pound or 2 or 3 off which can make all the difference in the world.

you want to be champ at jr mid then fight at jr mid PERIOD !