Pac Didnt Beat The Fighter That Mattered

The fact that he purposely missed weight against a guy as small as Marquez is pathetic. It's a disgrace and it's embarrassing.

 

Skip Bayless is the most popular person at ESPN. Don't listen to ESPN. They've compromised their integrity for ratings a long time ago.

 

Skip bayless is also one of the biggest Pac****s there is they could have used his vote in that ESPN article.:rofl

 

Skip Bayless also said Tommy Hearns was overrated. That Pacquiao's best win was DLH. And that GGG isn't too big for Mayweather.

So this is the boxing mind we're dealing with here. It's almost impossible to be a bigger dumbass than skip bayless.

 

Logic is subjective and even the most so called agreeable facts can be used in differing context to argue contradictive view points.

So your argument boils down to the perceived figurative weight of an opinion determined by a subjective logic and subjective application of so called facts, which may not be facts.

 

Only read the 1st line of your post,that was enough to see that your an imbecile with zero knowledge of boxing

 

Pac wasnt the same after 3k batt

 

Yea, let's just write off Pacs career cos he couldn't beat Mayweather. Christ.

 

Or an imbecile would waste his time reading something that the first sentence gave away as being a waste.

 

Pacquiao, Castillo and Maidana all beat Floyd Mayweather.

Floyd's record is 46-3 to any realistic person.

 

To any bitter troll it's realistic but to anyone sane and who lives in reality his record is 49-0:deal

 

Pac's cuts from the third Marquez fight didn't heal when it mattered the most.

 

ring generalship is secondary to clean effective shots landing which pac won on, despite mayweather running a marathon to make it appear as though hes controlling the pace.

you are not the ring general when your opponent is outpointing you, and hurting you more than you him.