Pac does not plan fight Thurman Despite Rumors

I don't doubt that either but that's not enough reason for him to be in a government position. We vote for leaders that can lead and sadly that ain't pac.

 

Ask his wife about his integrity..

 

@dangerousity and look at how he spends his own money to get an idea what suggestions he would give to the goverment.

 

How does he spends his money? Oh, he's built entire villages and schools and hospitals.

The guy could have just lived off of his fame and do bad acting and singing and public appearances. But he CHOSE to be a public servant at the peak of his career (which resulted in negative effects).

 

I'm sure his countriy felt negative effects as well with him as a senator.

 

Again, the perfect option would be incompetence and good intentions. But if the choice was corruption or incompetence with good intentions, I’d choose the latter every time.

 

You sound like a ***** talking about infidelity. Literally, outside of this forum the only people I hear complaining about men’s infedelity are women.

Try having millions of women being thrown at you and having all the money and fame in the world, let’s see if you don’t give into the temptation once in a while.

After all that, they’re still together, he’s loyal and raised a good family. Heck 70% of America are broken homes.

 

Oh how naive. If that's your preference might as well make a child a president since they're so innocent and incapable of corruption they can lead a nation, right? Anyhow i won't entertain this talk anymore as this is a boxing forum and not a philosophical and political one

 

Haha I couldn't give 2 f***s what he gets up to in his spare time! Heck, why not when he's getting them throwing themselves at him!

Can't stand the sanctimonious bs from his fans though! He ain't an angel himself!

 

Could you cite one or two of the negative effects his country felt as a result of Pac becoming a senator ?

 

I just can guess what an incompetent part-time politician with a "give money to the poor" mentality can do.

 

So, no?

just speculation ?

 

So you would rather have a corrupt fool run instead? Nothing I said is naive. I clearly stated 2 options, and for the most part there are only 2 on the philippines. A corrupt politician who will steal from the country, or a guy who will go broke giving back to his country?

And this is under the assumption that pacquiao is completely incompetent at his job.

 

70%?

 

I’m going by the divorce rates. In many cases there’s no marriage in the first place.