pac fans putting spin on bradley/marquez?

Pacquiao vs Marquez:

- Pacquiao 2-1-1 against Marquez.

Pacquiao vs Bradley:

- On June 21, 2012, the five WBO Championship Committee judges on the review panel announced that Pacquiao should have won his controversial defeat, with all scoring the fight unanimously in Pacquiao's favor — 117-111, 117-111, 118-110, 116-112 and 115-113.

- Among the Boxing Experts, 121 scored the bout for Pacquiao, 1 scored the bout a draw, and 1 scored the bout for Bradley.
None of the scores for Pacquiao was offered by Philippine media.
The draw score and the score for Bradley were not provided by American media.

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Manny_Pacquiao_vs._Timothy_Bradley

 

Doesnt that just make your argument more valid. Anyone with two eyes saw Pac hit Bradley more, harder, clearer. He even said after the fight that he didnt know if he won or not, that he would go home and watch the fight to determine if he had won or not.

If youve ever been in a fight, and thought you won the fight, why would you go home and watch the fight over to determine if you won or not? I know what your reply will be, just unbelievable how people like yourself actually believe this BS.

 

Get Floyd's nuts out your mouth .. as with most *****'s, your agenda is as subtle as an elephant in the kitchen.

 

OK,
I am glad you are passionate about this issue enough to do this, you however are in the minority. Most people would disagree with you as I do. It is my opinion that the fighter who lands the most punches, more consistently, accurately, more defining shots, for most of the fight, wins the fight. If one cannot agree with this then I dont know what to tell you. You are entitled to your opinion and who knows, you might just not like Pac for whatever reasons. Most people who saw the fight, that were even going for Bradley will tell you what they saw, and that is that Pac won the fight.

 

Only the most flaming ***** would argue that PAC didn't win the fight.

 

Ok you may not be a juantard but you clearly have an agenda you want to push with this thread. Look at your posts. Only a floyd dickrider or a juantard will say that Pacquiao didn't beat Bradley but their opinions mean jack ****.

 

Also two out of three judges said Bradley won and their opinions are really the only ones that count.

 

This isn't a victory for Pac/fans, but IMO it just proves that Pac is a much greater fighter than JMM. JMM gives Pac a whole lot of trouble, just as Ken Norton gave Ali a lot of trouble.

However look at their fight history. Where Pac went life and death with JMM, and JMM goes on to lose to Chris John. Where Pac obliterates MAB, yet JMM squeezes out an SD vs a very past it MAB. Where JMM goes life and death with Juan Diaz, and have a tough war with katsidis, meanwhile Pac was taking out the likes of ODLH, Cotto and Hatton in a big way.

I think JMM is a great fighter, he's a 4 weight division champ and has beaten many champs. However take away 1 opponent from his resume and we see him struggling with much much lesser opponents, and losing decisions to fighters I think on paper he should have beaten easily.

Styles makes fights, Bradley employed same tactic as Mayweather vs JMM and didnt give him much opportunity to "counter".