PAC is a DAMN FEATHERWEIGHT

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by jianne, Jul 10, 2009.


Page 1 of 3
  1. jianne

    jianne OWNAGE Full Member

    837
    0
    Dec 5, 2008
    why people in here are asking pac to fight at 147 with cotto? Cotto is a legit welter and pac is a legit feather or should we say a lightweight instead. It is just fair if they meet halfway. so stop the non sense.
    I think a lot of pac hater just want him to loss.
     
    jianne, Jul 10, 2009
    jianne, Jul 10, 2009
    #1
  2. fenian 67

    fenian 67 Active Member Full Member

    1,388
    0
    Mar 19, 2009
    the only thing worse than a hater is a nut hugger
     
    fenian 67, Jul 10, 2009
    fenian 67, Jul 10, 2009
    #2
  3. ghettowizard

    ghettowizard Member Full Member

    418
    0
    Sep 17, 2008
    2004 called..
     
    ghettowizard, Jul 10, 2009
    ghettowizard, Jul 10, 2009
    #3
  4. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,242
    83,152
    Nov 30, 2006

    How about not at all? How about Cotto fights welterweights and Pacquiao fights lightweights, even if it means less money for both of them? :deal
     
    IntentionalButt, Jul 10, 2009
    IntentionalButt, Jul 10, 2009
    #4
  5. jianne

    jianne OWNAGE Full Member

    837
    0
    Dec 5, 2008

    :signs ******* will always get the last laughed idio*
     
    jianne, Jul 10, 2009
    jianne, Jul 10, 2009
    #5
  6. evalistinho

    evalistinho Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,476
    2
    Feb 27, 2008
    Pac is a legit JWW now. 140 is perfect for him. Its just that the big fights are against welterweights.
     
    evalistinho, Jul 10, 2009
    evalistinho, Jul 10, 2009
    #6
  7. jianne

    jianne OWNAGE Full Member

    837
    0
    Dec 5, 2008
    tell me is 147 or 140 is pacs legit weight? I don't thinks so. so STFU
     
    jianne, Jul 10, 2009
    jianne, Jul 10, 2009
    #7
  8. ghettowizard

    ghettowizard Member Full Member

    418
    0
    Sep 17, 2008
    and james toney is a middleweight
     
    ghettowizard, Jul 10, 2009
    ghettowizard, Jul 10, 2009
    #8
  9. fenian 67

    fenian 67 Active Member Full Member

    1,388
    0
    Mar 19, 2009
    so ****ing stupid.im a boxing fan and i try to be fair with my points but i come across these ******s who act like ****ing children.
     
    fenian 67, Jul 10, 2009
    fenian 67, Jul 10, 2009
    #9
  10. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,264
    15,085
    Dec 6, 2008
    Pac should fight JWWs or agree to 145. 143 is too low for Cotto.
     
    Babality, Jul 10, 2009
    Babality, Jul 10, 2009
    #10
  11. lern1079

    lern1079 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,978
    0
    Feb 3, 2005
    Ok so if Pac is a featherweight and Cotto is a WW and they meet half way they should fight at 136.5 lbs :patsch

    Another dumb nuthugger.
     
    lern1079, Jul 10, 2009
    lern1079, Jul 10, 2009
    #11
  12. charlievint

    charlievint Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,338
    1
    Jul 22, 2004
    Eh.....that's a bit far. He's proably a legit Super Feather weight who is filling out as a Jr WW. But no question he can make 135 easily still. But his training, conditioning and nutrition is geared towards making him a LEGIT Jr WW. Naturally PAC maybe a 130 or 135 lbs fighter but he's got the tools and natrual gifts to successfuly seek challenges north.
     
    charlievint, Jul 10, 2009
    charlievint, Jul 10, 2009
    #12
  13. jianne

    jianne OWNAGE Full Member

    837
    0
    Dec 5, 2008

    This is what I hate most of the posters here in ESB if you are a pacfan you'll be called a hugger but not a boxing fan. I love cotto, pac, mosley, jmm, barrera and the rest of the great fighters but just hate what I read here in ESB that pac will not be getting all the credits if he beats cotto at 143. and if that happens its cotto's fault because he takes the fight.
    peace man don't want to make fight with you just want to share my view
     
    jianne, Jul 10, 2009
    jianne, Jul 10, 2009
    #13
  14. Chert

    Chert Ringside Potato Full Member

    4,863
    1
    Feb 14, 2006
    pac is still a relatively small jr. welter though. he is now more of a big lightweight while cotto is a big welter.
     
    Chert, Jul 10, 2009
    Chert, Jul 10, 2009
    #14
  15. jianne

    jianne OWNAGE Full Member

    837
    0
    Dec 5, 2008
    if I'm dumb your dumber:patsch
    what I'm trying to say is that 143 is just fair knowing pac is not a legit JRWW OR WW.
     
    jianne, Jul 10, 2009
    jianne, Jul 10, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 3