Pac is dangerously close to becoming a full-blown Cherry-picker!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Spitbucket, Aug 28, 2008.


  1. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    the proper term here is "cash-out" and not "cherry-pick".
     
  2. Sting

    Sting Akagami no Shanks Full Member

    2,998
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    Virtually everybody. You know what virtually means? There were 1 or 2 posters who agreed with you. But everybody else's answer to your thread is a resounding NO.

    Your own thread already had its own say Spitbucket. And that is Pac is not even close to becoming a full-blown cherry-picker. If anything he should be commended for fighting a much bigger and stronger guy. Alot of us here already made our voices known, especially me. If you can't seem to handle it, Then tough. Deal with it. Your making it seem like what your saying here is a fact and nobody is allowed to disagree with you.
     
  3. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    I'm very aware of that and I'll be just fine, but it's still not changing my opinion!

    And this is where you come off like a jack-ass.

    I posted my opinion(NOT a FACT), you posted yours.

    I have no problem with your opinion but you seem to have a problem with mine.:hi:
     
  4. Superfuzz

    Superfuzz Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,598
    0
    Aug 1, 2008
    I hope you are not trying to say Pac is like PBF. Pac fighting DLH, is like PBF wanting to fight Hopkins. And we all know that would never happen. Pac deserves our prayers and greatest respect.
     
  5. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    I have nothing but respect for Pac, he is my second favorite fighter:deal

    Matter of fact I'm hoping(against all odds) that he somehow embarrasses DLH but none of that changes anything I wrote in my opening post!
     
  6. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    Well you've clearly stated to logical reasons why the supposed strike 1 and 2 are excused so I'd say Pac hasn't yet sustained any strikes. :deal
     
  7. Sting

    Sting Akagami no Shanks Full Member

    2,998
    0
    Jan 19, 2008
    You don't have a problem with my post yet you call me a "fool" and "jackass"?

    And yes, I do have a problem with your post. But hey its all for good debate, Spit. I don't have any agenda on here nor would I resort myself to name calling and stuff like that.
     
  8. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    clever:good

    But no matter the excuse, a strike is a strike:deal
     
  9. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    No harm done, this is all in fun:good

    BUt just to set the record straight you initiated the personal attacks with a passive-aggressive post
    I was just reponding in kind(below is your initial reply):

     
  10. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006
    :good
     
  11. hooligan

    hooligan Millionaire Bum Full Member

    4,499
    10
    May 8, 2006
    let me ask you this...if your pacman who will you fight? soto or dlh?

    lemme guess you'll pick dlh? :hey
     
  12. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest


    I would cherry-pick him indeed:deal
     
  13. Beenie

    Beenie Evolve already! Full Member

    19,105
    42
    Apr 12, 2008
    So what exactly constitutes a strike? What happens if Pac fights Hatton after de la Hoya even if Hatton losses to Malignaggi? Is that a strike?
     
  14. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    That was kinda harsh....................did your AA meeting just finish!
     
  15. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    I think you know the answer to that one.:deal