Pac is now above PBF all time regardless of the outcome of their future fight

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by yesihavearm2, Nov 15, 2009.


  1. paulfv

    paulfv Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,853
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    This counts the Ring titles or whatever that Pac obtained at those two weights. All the write-ups and boxing writers say it is seven titles in seven divisions [<-- Link], and this is the commonly-accepted understanding. He didn't win real belts, but he beat the established champions in those weight classes. Barrera was a lot more legitimate "titlist" than, say, Baldomir in terms of their relative standing. Fans and boxing experts know that.

    Floyd isn't likely to win titles -- Ring or otherwise -- in two more weight classes. He certainly isn't likely to do so against, say, a MW version of Cotto.

    And that's why PBF isn't likely to be regarded as well as Pac in terms of legacy, even if PBF beats the "midget," Pac.
     
  2. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007

    so now you're questioning pacs quality of opposition?:patsch

    if pac's path to greatness is easy was what you claimed to be, then what more with mayweather's? lol!
     
  3. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007

    midget is totally fine considering the fact that pac started at 106 pounds, lol! and a midget welterweight champion at that, lol!
     
  4. Totomabs

    Totomabs Sauna Belt Holder Full Member

    4,226
    0
    Dec 9, 2007
    and speaking of catchweights, floyd did asked for a catchweight fight with a fighter two divisions below him and worse, he intentionally tipped in the scales 2lbs overweight to ensure his victory. How's that for an idol? lol!
     
  5. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    I know you are a die hard PBF fan. No problem.
    The slight problem is that you are underestimating PAC!

    After seeing PAC dismantle cotto.....Bet your house on PAC and you'll
    have a bigger house!

    If you bet against PAC! I don't want you to blame pbf for being homeless.

    cheers!
     
  6. Irishbc

    Irishbc Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,177
    1
    Mar 15, 2009

    As son as you said you had Cotto by stoppage I stopped reading, you're opinion is invalid
     
  7. hagman1989

    hagman1989 the boxing site , try it Full Member

    8,284
    1
    Dec 13, 2008
    i think if floyd wins hell be the 1 rememberd as the best
     
  8. BoxingFanNo1

    BoxingFanNo1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,867
    13
    Jan 20, 2009
    Pacs resume pisses on Floyds regardless of the outcome.
    Even with a PBF victory - Pac > Floyd.

    Floyd needs a couple more names IMO, say Mosley and Williams.
     
  9. KO Boxing

    KO Boxing Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,055
    4
    Apr 30, 2006
    No, the winner of the two will be the greatest. Undeniably. Pac's looked better in the last few years than he EVER has, so if Floyd can beat this version of Pac (who's proven to be able to destroy proven welterweights) than Floyd would have always beaten him at any weight and is the greater fighter (and vice versa, of course).

    If they never fight though, Pac takes it.
     
  10. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    returnoftheking.

    please do us a favor. please die.

    or if that is too difficult for you to do. please read this.

    pbf best wins. corrales. castillo. genaro. dlh. hatton.

    jmm win? fighting a 36 year old lightweight.

    of the5 top wins. only dlh would have a borderline chance of cracking the atg list.


    goodbye.
     
  11. Vitor Belfort

    Vitor Belfort Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,334
    3
    Dec 17, 2008

    funny how floyd fans calling pacman cherry picking his opponents:lol: Last time i check floyd fought gatti(rip) instead of tszyu..judah who just loss to baldomir:lol:.. funny how you mentioned corrales and castillo winning titles after they loss to floyd but failed to mention barrera doing the same thing after losing to pacman. Marquez also won titles at 135 after losing to pacman at 130.

    Oh and Morales and Barrera are 100X better than baldomir will ever be:lol:
     
  12. Kush

    Kush Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,095
    980
    Dec 16, 2007
    Agree, Frauds garbage. Only the Mayweather clan, Eddie Murphy, Ellerbe and 7-11 employees put Fraud above Pac.
     
  13. pare

    pare Active Member Full Member

    626
    2
    Oct 20, 2008
    returnoftheking is one of those typical pac haters who insist that pac would be greater if he had fought

    juarez, soto, valero, campbell, guzman

    instead of

    barrera, morales, marquez, de la hoya, hatton, cotto.
     
  14. betabong

    betabong Active Member Full Member

    733
    0
    Apr 28, 2009
    That is so very true.... but only to the Gayweatherfans like you.
     
  15. SAS2

    SAS2 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,173
    2
    Jun 24, 2006
    pac is well above pbf all-time. not even close.