Pacquiao is willie pep JMM is sandy sadler sandy might of had pep's number... but pep is still the greater fighter same as JMM might be pac's kryptonite, but Pac is still the greater fighter
JMM has moved up to beat Pac who according to you is the GOAT. That basically trumps anything Pac has done!:deal
so you would rate JMM in front of Pac, in ATG list JMM tards... even most ESB fans, marquez fans know that Pac has a greater legacy
Pacquiao has had three opportunities to separate himself from Juan Manuel Marquez and has yet to have done so. At 126, 130, AND 144. Pacquiao is an all-time great (to what extent is the real debate, and I don't consider him one of the truly elite head to head greats in any division he's fought in). Anybody who discredits his status as such is a certified moron. His accomplishments are spectacular. But head to head, he's not better than Juan Manuel Marquez. 10x better? Get out with that.
Is it? Ali was not in his prime at any point he fought Norton. Norton would've given him some problems during his younger days, but it's doubtful he would've been as successful as he was in their three fights had he been fighting Ali from the 1960s. Meanwhile, Pacquiao has arguably lost to Marquez all three times across 18 pounds and 7 years.
one can argue that Pac should of won the first fight, since the judge DID and ADMITTED he made a mistake, which if he havn't would of sealed the first victory for Pac
**** off. You're just trying to play semantics in order to discredit JMM. Only bitter ******* would do that!
JMM is a bum, a mexican bum.. that is not an ATG.. and Pac resume, legacy is ten times better then JMM