Pac is still ten times better then JMM

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Koman600, Nov 14, 2011.


  1. elchivito

    elchivito master betty Full Member

    27,489
    439
    Sep 27, 2008
    Hell yea. Not only does Pacman duck African Americans he ducks Columbians too.
     
  2. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    the situation is very similar to Ali and Norton.
     
  3. Koman600

    Koman600 Guest

    Pacquiao is willie pep

    JMM is sandy sadler


    sandy might of had pep's number... but pep is still the greater fighter

    same as

    JMM might be pac's kryptonite, but Pac is still the greater fighter
     
  4. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    JMM has moved up to beat Pac who according to you is the GOAT.

    That basically trumps anything Pac has done!:deal
     
  5. Koman600

    Koman600 Guest

    so you would rate JMM in front of Pac, in ATG list:lol::lol::lol:

    JMM tards...


    even most ESB fans, marquez fans know that Pac has a greater legacy
     
  6. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009

    In some ways.

    But beating Pac in three different divisions makes JMM a better fighter PFP than PAC.
     
  7. Koman600

    Koman600 Guest

    but not having a greater legacy
     
  8. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    Only an idiot would dispute that!
     
  9. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Pacquiao has had three opportunities to separate himself from Juan Manuel Marquez and has yet to have done so. At 126, 130, AND 144. Pacquiao is an all-time great (to what extent is the real debate, and I don't consider him one of the truly elite head to head greats in any division he's fought in). Anybody who discredits his status as such is a certified moron. His accomplishments are spectacular. But head to head, he's not better than Juan Manuel Marquez.

    10x better? Get out with that.
     
  10. Koman600

    Koman600 Guest

    legacy wise, reusme wise yes he is.. by alot

    besides pac, JMM resume is crap
     
  11. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Is it? Ali was not in his prime at any point he fought Norton. Norton would've given him some problems during his younger days, but it's doubtful he would've been as successful as he was in their three fights had he been fighting Ali from the 1960s. Meanwhile, Pacquiao has arguably lost to Marquez all three times across 18 pounds and 7 years.
     
  12. Koman600

    Koman600 Guest

    one can argue that Pac should of won the first fight, since the judge DID and ADMITTED he made a mistake, which if he havn't would of sealed the first victory for Pac
     
  13. Gonzarelli

    Gonzarelli Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,063
    1
    Apr 29, 2009
    **** off.

    You're just trying to play semantics in order to discredit JMM.

    Only bitter ******* would do that!
     
  14. ecdrm15

    ecdrm15 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,286
    108
    Apr 30, 2008
    HA!

    Better @ higher weights? Maybe. But not till he fights floyd
     
  15. Koman600

    Koman600 Guest

    JMM is a bum, a mexican bum.. that is not an ATG.. and Pac resume, legacy is ten times better then JMM