Bull****! Marquez looked better than he did for Mayweather, but there was still some traces of fat on his sides and belly that were not evident with Pacquiao. The PED cheat Pacquiao carries his weight lean and trim, which is not the case with Marquez.
yeah and I called Cotto a ***** for that. Cotto attempting to get a catchweight against Margarito was worse than what Pac did to him
the truest outcomes would rather be when they were in their primes and in great shape at 126 and at 130 - moreso than in 2011 at a catchweight of 144. Third fight was a draw on my card. I know most people scored it for Marquez but also if you look at their scorecards they can never agree on which rounds Pac lost, which shows a fight with a lot of swing rounds.
yeah i'm talking about timeline to point out the other posters ignorance. of course you guys won't get it.
Lost ****! The only thing thats happened here is that Pacquiao has been unable to consistently put good leather on a moving target which is what come about with his last 3 opponents, Mosley, Marquez, and Bradley. The other welters he's fought were right in front of him like stationary punching bags.
in that case a higher weight wouldn't help Pacquiao. You can't have it both ways. it's funny cause you say Marquez came up from 135 to fight Pacquiao and it hurt him, but noone admits that it hurt PAcquiao to come up from 130 to fight Oscar.
nah man he's clearly past it. I've been saying Pac is on the decline for almost 3 years I'm surprised you don't see it.
oh we all know how bright you are man. I guess you're just so brilliant, everybody else saw your statement as ******ed because we can't comprehend it :good Man all you damn *******s claimed Pacquiao was dehydrated at 130 and said he was best at WW because he wasn't draining himself anymore. I remember this **** like yesterday. It was your reason why he became so good and why he lost to Juan the second time. I know Divac and Leon remembers this ****. and how wouldn't the higher weight not help Pac?
Stop with your nonsense of convincing yourself and others the fight was close. What most people that even gave Pacquiao some rounds agreed on was that none of the rounds they gave him were clear convincing rounds. That those rounds even given to Pac could have just as easily flipped the other way, but that the majority of rounds that they gave Marquez, were beyond being clear. In other words they were admitting to having a scoring bias in favor of Pacquiao, which is why their scorecard read close, and yet still for Marquez despite having that scoring bias in favor of Pacquiao. The fight was not close in the least, and every boxing broadcast team in the world except HBO's who has an interest financially on Pacquiao, thought so.
JMM hired a guy that has been involved in cheating to help in his preparation and all of a sudden he looks stronger than ever??? im not suspecting that JMM is on peds im flat out saying that hes on some illegal ****.if you dont like it sue me.
apart from the obvious one this is the best fight that manny could have right now, i'm happy with this tbh.
LOL....its been a few years since the Cotto fight buddy....these men are getting older and making those lower weights are getting harder to make. 147 is a good weight for both men. A catch weight would have been fine as well but of course those who bash Manny would have something to say no.matter what.
Dude you dont have a ****ing clue on how to score a ****ing fight specially when it involves one of your idols, hell you had Julio Cesar Chavez ahead of Meldrick Taylor on the cards at the time of the stoppage in their first fight for ****s sake, when it comes to JMM or Chavez but specially JMM you're as bad a fanboy as there is in this site, dont know why fools still bother with your biased bull****.