Pac-Marquez confirmed for Primetime

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by ishy, Oct 8, 2011.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mike464

    mike464 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,846
    0
    Sep 10, 2005
    I'm cancelling Sky Sports. This is exactly what I'm paying them for. When the number one guy in the sport fights they are supposed to show it.

    Adam "Session" Smith seems to think we're more interested in watching pundits talk. Just show the ****ing fights.
     
  2. Bill C84

    Bill C84 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,219
    1
    Sep 11, 2011
    Is Adam Smith still the head of Boxing at Sky? If he is he's doing a great job :thumbsup:patsch
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    275
    Jul 22, 2004
    I liked the team they had for the Mayweather fight. It's annoying Primetime doesn't have HD, will boxnation be in HD? It should be for the money, I'm on Virgin so can't get it yet. Ideally boxnation will have Frank's stuff and all the big US fights

    Yes SS does do other sports, but it should provide boxing too, that's it's remit and it's been scrimping on it for years and passed up many big fights, which with the competition won't happen now - ie at least there'll be big fights that we have the option to watch instead of them being passed up. That's why Setanta had success and was a god send. Hopefully boxnation is as good
     
  4. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    I'm not paying. Primetime need to improve their production and put it in HD.

    BoxNation, here I come. I'd much rather pay less for Box Nation but get a whole lot more than 1 poor PPV. For some reason, BoxNation pictures looks better than PT too!
     
  5. Bill C84

    Bill C84 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,219
    1
    Sep 11, 2011
    Im surprised the man from Venus has not been on here trying to relieve people of there hard earned money? Maybe the man has got a soul?
     
  6. Thaiad24

    Thaiad24 Active Member Full Member

    1,143
    3
    Jul 18, 2011
    Great!!!! we get a shitter quality picture, a **** commentary team and £15 lighter

    thankyou Primetime you ****ing wankers

    sky can **** off too, now that the Rugby League has finished, what the **** am i gonna watch for 22 quid a month?
     
  7. hitandhope

    hitandhope Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,339
    28
    May 2, 2009
    Hear hear. 15 quid for the awful picture quality Primetime give, may as well watch it on a parasite stream.

    I think Sky are completely to blame for this one. Primetime can't have afforded to offer a massive amount for the fight..
     
  8. Uncle Rico

    Uncle Rico Loyal Member Full Member

    39,748
    3
    Jun 28, 2009
    Boxing is slowly leaving SkySports. Quite a few only pay their subscription to Sky because of the boxing, and if Sky continuously fail to get these big fights, then they'll see quite a big exodus of subscribers (boxing fans). And those that are complaining about Primetime and Box Nation not having HD, give them time, guys. They're young channels, and it's not feasible for them to invest in HD straight away.
     
  9. northbakbren

    northbakbren Member Full Member

    472
    0
    Feb 8, 2011
    Has it actually be confirmed this fight is on primetime?

    Link?
     
  10. Jonsey

    Jonsey Boxing Junkie banned

    11,130
    0
    May 17, 2011
    its funny how everyone thinks there a tv executive all of a sudden. obviously box nation and primetime are paying over the odds for there boxing. sky will only buy stuff if they see an ROI.

    in 2 years time there will be no box nation or primetime and sky will come back in.

    if you pay £25 a month just for sky sports boxing your getting mugged off a long time ago.
     
  11. WalletInspector

    WalletInspector Obsessed with Boxing banned

    21,194
    2
    Jan 1, 2010
    The irony of it... :rofl
     
  12. ScouseLad

    ScouseLad Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,080
    0
    Jul 14, 2007
    Haha you've got a bit of a cheek, you think you're the internets Bob Arum!
     
  13. achillesthegreat

    achillesthegreat FORTUNE FAVOURS THE BRAVE Full Member

    37,070
    29
    Jul 21, 2004
    Unfortunately, it is in our best interests to let PT go under. Their business model does not work and it shouldn't be supported.

    At first, it was nice but we've quickly seen they are just interested in robbing us of £15. It's not value for money otherwise it would be £7 and I wouldn't mind paying that. Sky gives you the fight card with bells and whistles for £15. Primetime have very poor coverage, no marketing and no HD.

    PT are stealing business for BN and Sky. BN and Sky are the platforms I want to see boxing on as they seem more serious about it.
     
  14. insider

    insider Journeyman Opponent Full Member

    446
    0
    Jul 9, 2011
    Achiles that's just silly saying it's in our best interests to let PT die. As if it's our call??
    And to say they are stealing fights is factually wrong. Surely no channel has a divine right to the fights. In a free Market anyone can bid.

    But I agree it would be nice if PT showed us more boxing for our money.

     
  15. bam bam

    bam bam Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,589
    0
    Mar 30, 2010
    :rofl:patsch:rofl:patsch:rofl:patschHes a promoter,matchmaker,manager,tv exec rolled into one.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.