PAC - Marquez rounds 2-12, how do you see these rounds?

Big myth was that Marquez won most of these rounds by a big margin when he clearly didnt.

Its very similiar to the Margarito/Williams fight when the crowd noise played a big factor.

With the sound on i gave Pacman 4 of the 11 rounds, with the sound off I gave Pacman 6 of the 11.

 

Marquez by one point, and pac nuthuggers cant realy argu, it could had been one point for pac or a draw too

 

That is intereting. i had pac winning by one round and JMM did do a number on Pac for most of the fight. But a schooling to me is a complete shut out and making the other fighter look amateurish (or the first round).

 

Based on what?

If not for bigtime 9 you would be the biggest nutthugging moron on this forum. As it is your in a distant 2nd place.

 

Exaclty, WTF is he talking about?

 

both judges who scored it 115-110 for both fighters were watching another fight. i had it pac winning by a round

 

i think there is quite a logical explanation.

pac looked like he was being schooled by jmm because he was getting caught everytime he goes comes in. pac tried a bazillion jab-straight combos in that fight, as i don't think he threw anything other than that. but he got countered by jmm most of the time so some people may see it as schooling, but then i think that those people who saw it as a schooling failed to see that as one dimensional as they may seem, some of those one-twos by pac tagged jmm multiple times from the 2nd to the 12th round, i think this is where the close rounds are being scored. they liked the fact that pac initiated the exchanges even thought jmm got the better of them most of the time.

 

I thought it was when i saw it 1st but when i watched it again with volume turn down i have PAc winning by a point.

 

That is true. The judge that had it a draw, scored round 1 10-7 to Pac:-(