Pac Says No Fight in March or May. Has to be After The Elections.

I couldn't agree more there's always two sides as to why fights don't get made. But PBF haters always blame him and not look at the other side.

 

honestly they will somehow turn this around on Floyd... I have already heard "Floyd only agreed to March 13 because he knew Manny would say no"

Manny doesn't want this fight.. he knows he'll get his ass beat.. and I think deep down his fans know it too

 

I agree. I've always said the only people who don't want this fight are *******s, PBF haters, and Team Pac. I remember in that interview with Pac coming out of that elevator he said when referring to PBF "he might beat me". Even he realizes PBF is a tall order and isn't tailor made for him like his last few fights.

 

You ****ing useless sack of **** Catchiao. This is all on Roach. Roach couldnt be happier for this little Fraud to go on his quest to save the ****ing Philippines. He wants Mayweather as far away from his prime as he can get him.

I hope you get burnt to the ground in the election, and Floyd pisses on your ashes, you ****ing wad.

 

Pac you're lettin me down, buddy. This is bull crap, give the fans what they want.

 

Because,Pac has nothing to prove.:deal

 

No Mayweather is getting that "If you beat me my changes of winning what ever stupid election Im wasting my time with goes straight out the window so Im gonna play it safe and stay farrrrrr away from you" treatment.

 

Sure he does before retired PBF he was #1 P4P not the other way around.:deal Pac must prove that he's better than PBF the real P4P king who only lost his crown by retiring.

 

If it was the other way around and Floyd was the one using elections as an excuse to not make this fight the board would be flooded with haters talking ****

 

No when they were both at 140 Arum said Cotto is to green for Floyd. It's a known fact and it was made very public.

 

And people say *******s are bad?

 

How can somone prove that they are #1 p4p? That's ******ed. You can't prove something that is mythical and hypothetical and subjective. Even if pac was to lose to floyd you could make an argument that he is the better fighter p4p because of his size.

I hate the way that people act like p4p is some official title that can be proven or won or lost.

 

p4p #1 in a race...PBF never beat Pac to be #1, so why does Pac need to beat PBF to be #1? Its simple, PBF got to #1 first, took some time off, Pac caught up and then some...now if Pac stays inactive whilst running for office and PBF makes noise, he catches up again and maybe reinstalled as #1.

Being 1 p4p has never been about who beat who in the ring, often 1 & 2 never get to fight...its just what they have done lately & overall. The majority of the public rates Pac's accomplishments higher therefore his 1...PBF can regain that by beating some top fighters, or in this case the quickest route would be beating Pac himself.