Pac v Cotto at 145. Who will give the winner full credit? Who won't?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by dhenzrae, Jul 20, 2009.


Page 2 of 4
  1. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008



    no bro, cottos only saying 145 cause pacs insisting on a CW

    on cotto's term would be 147
     
    radab, Jul 20, 2009
    radab, Jul 20, 2009
    #16
  2. psychopath

    psychopath D' "X" Factor Full Member

    26,390
    2
    Mar 13, 2007
    Ok . . . so I can pick two options. :D

    I just did.
     
    psychopath, Jul 20, 2009
    psychopath, Jul 20, 2009
    #17
  3. Guidokz

    Guidokz Classic Psycho Full Member

    2,154
    0
    Apr 6, 2009
    :rofl
     
    Guidokz, Jul 20, 2009
    Guidokz, Jul 20, 2009
    #18
  4. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    thanks for voting :good
     
    dhenzrae, Jul 20, 2009
    dhenzrae, Jul 20, 2009
    #19
  5. igor_otsky

    igor_otsky Undefeated Full Member

    14,285
    6
    Jul 26, 2008

    -cherry-picked bigger guys than him. damn unbelievable.. and he's crazy.. Well maybe next time he'll cherry pick The Klits.
     
    igor_otsky, Jul 20, 2009
    igor_otsky, Jul 20, 2009
    #20
  6. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008



    he said no :'(
     
    radab, Jul 20, 2009
    radab, Jul 20, 2009
    #21
  7. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    technically, it's still his term not pac's. but i understand what you're saying.

    this is a better illustration:

    pac's term - 143 (still 3 lbs above his division)

    cotto's term - 147 (his division)

    agreed weight - 145

    sounds fair to me.
     
    dhenzrae, Jul 20, 2009
    dhenzrae, Jul 20, 2009
    #22
  8. Guidokz

    Guidokz Classic Psycho Full Member

    2,154
    0
    Apr 6, 2009
    because you're a ***** you *****..:lol:
     
    Guidokz, Jul 20, 2009
    Guidokz, Jul 20, 2009
    #23
  9. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    Nope......JMM's already married to divac!!!:deal:hey
     
    tolindoy, Jul 20, 2009
    tolindoy, Jul 20, 2009
    #24
  10. Ringnut

    Ringnut Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,009
    2
    May 1, 2009
    true, and JMM never struck me as the polygamous type.

    anyway... where's the hate? the poll seems strangely one sided.
     
    Ringnut, Jul 20, 2009
    Ringnut, Jul 20, 2009
    #25
  11. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008
    ^ you guys are gonna get me banned again ^
     
    radab, Jul 20, 2009
    radab, Jul 20, 2009
    #26
  12. GcIII

    GcIII Active Member Full Member

    932
    0
    Jun 27, 2009

    :rofl

    WE DARE!
     
    GcIII, Jul 20, 2009
    GcIII, Jul 20, 2009
    #27
  13. Guidokz

    Guidokz Classic Psycho Full Member

    2,154
    0
    Apr 6, 2009
    that's the idea..:yep

    just kidding radab, we need clowns like you here..:rofl
     
    Guidokz, Jul 20, 2009
    Guidokz, Jul 20, 2009
    #28
  14. radab

    radab Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,721
    1
    Dec 14, 2008


    :good

    go vote on my "who you want to see pac fight next thread" - i want to see the *******s take on this
     
    radab, Jul 20, 2009
    radab, Jul 20, 2009
    #29
  15. GcIII

    GcIII Active Member Full Member

    932
    0
    Jun 27, 2009
    hmmm....i voted JMM, but honestly, i wanted Cotto:good Sure slambang!
     
    GcIII, Jul 20, 2009
    GcIII, Jul 20, 2009
    #30
Page 2 of 4