fair enough chicken **** :yep after all you do have the definition of "toy" on your side to debate :hi: I did my best, we shall leave it at a friendly "I told you so"
Ha, that's laughable. You called me out, I put up the stakes and the best you can offer is for a photo in women's underwear. It sounds like something out of Saved By The Bell. Why don't you man up and say "I over-exaggerated on my initial call." Or, "Not even I believe the BS that just came out of my mouth, hence my not willing to bet money." Or "$200 is way too much, what's more reasonable?" As for the definition of toy... think Pac v Oscar, Calzaghe v Lacy etc etc and so forth. I thought it was self explanatory. I'd have let you debate it, you said it, it depends on what you meant. It's all good.
I find embarassment to the loser a much bigger thrill than recieving money, i would never accept that much off someone or put simply i never bet money. I am sorry for saying you aint man enough Ippy please for give me :smooch but noway am i kidding about Pac toying with Hatton.
Mate it's all good. You originally had a dig about me, when I said "I'd love to bet you" on that. I called you out. It's no big deal. It's an easy bet IMO. It'll be a war one way or the other.
it was a friday arvo and i was deliberately trying to wind someone up. At the moment we could probably take bets on "will the fight take place" Floyd will be licking his chops no matter which way it turns out.
FOTY if this comes off.after seeing Pacs destruction of DLH and his previous fight was his name DIAZ? i reckon he will win but the way these two fight it will be a barnstormer.
hatton would have beaten de la hoya that night there was something seriously wrong with de la hoya in that fight, if he fought like he did against mayweather he would have beaten pac but i still think pac will beat hatton