Pac V Naz at Featherweight.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by john b, Dec 30, 2007.


  1. john b

    john b EVERTON 0- OLdham 1 Full Member

    6,354
    0
    Jul 6, 2007
    This may have already been done but who would u have put your money on naz or pac. I would go with Naz nay other thoughts.
     
  2. peter5

    peter5 Marco.A.Barrera Full Member

    3,727
    3
    May 7, 2007
    This could go either way, but I get the feeling Naz would frustrate pac with his awkward style, So Id probably go with Naz
     
  3. john b

    john b EVERTON 0- OLdham 1 Full Member

    6,354
    0
    Jul 6, 2007
    Cheers naz was very eluisve in his prime and he could it with both hands.
     
  4. john b

    john b EVERTON 0- OLdham 1 Full Member

    6,354
    0
    Jul 6, 2007
    Why and How?
     
  5. africandawg

    africandawg Active Member Full Member

    535
    0
    Jul 29, 2007
    A promoters dream fight ---I would expect Naz to win inside the distance---except if he tried some of those Caesar Soto wrestling throws and was DSQed..
     
  6. Daft P

    Daft P Active Member Full Member

    1,434
    128
    Feb 27, 2005
    Pacman destroys Hamed. Hamed's (lack of) defence is suicide against Pacquiao. Very good fight, possibly both fighter rocked and comes to end within 4-5 rounds. Pacquiao TKO.
     
  7. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    Not really very accurate but thanks for trying :-(
     
  8. reed_man02

    reed_man02 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,097
    47
    Mar 18, 2006
  9. rydersonthestorm

    rydersonthestorm Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,957
    17
    Sep 27, 2007
    Did you even see the mab fight against naz, he outboxed him rather than out fought him, at feather weight there is pretty much nobody that could have stood and banged it out with naz. There are a decent number that could outbox him but he had alot of power and althougth he could be dropped when did you ever reeally see him hurt.
     
  10. africandawg

    africandawg Active Member Full Member

    535
    0
    Jul 29, 2007
    Naz was an arrogant ******* who belittled and taunted most of the opponents he fought during the fight----------Dont think Barrera/ Naz---Barrera fought him from the outside and that was Naz on the way down---ave. 116/112---not the hiding the mother needed...he did thrive on boxers taking the fight to him--he also had a good chin & just needed to time his unorthodox bombs as Pacman came in firing---**** what a matchup...:smoke
     
  11. peter5

    peter5 Marco.A.Barrera Full Member

    3,727
    3
    May 7, 2007
    But Morales out brawled pacman, and JMM out boxed him (even though he only got the draw) so I wouldnt be so confident your boy would get the win so easily. As for the first Barrera fight, Marco was caught cold if you ask me, Im not sure he expected Pacman to be that good, not stepping up in weight anyway. He should have lost to JMM too, the last 2 against Morales, morales was shot to **** at the weight. Naz would, in my opinion, TKO pac, or at least MD him,and no, Naz wasnt 6 nothches below him, 1 maybe.:smoke
     
  12. TFFP

    TFFP Guest

    Pac would be a much better fight for Naz

    MAB was just too smart, too good a boxer. He nullified Naz's threat perfectly. Naz wouldn't have to look for him, he could wait for Pac and unleash those bombs, and nobody survives a Naz bomb

    Naz KO 7, with knockdowns aplenty
     
  13. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
  14. thewoo

    thewoo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,769
    4
    Mar 3, 2005
    Styles make fights and Pac does not have the style to beat Naz. in order to beat Naz you have to not get hit. Pac would get hit and eventually stopped.