Pac vs. Cotto fight will be off if...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pwright2k, Oct 30, 2009.


  1. pwright2k

    pwright2k Member Full Member

    338
    0
    Aug 5, 2009
  2. the_what

    the_what Bolo Punch KO Full Member

    8,031
    0
    Jul 20, 2004
    Cotto makes 147 easily. He doesnt struggle to make the Welterweight limit.
     
  3. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    :deal
     
  4. pijo

    pijo Feed the Pope Full Member

    3,635
    1
    Jul 28, 2007
    Exactly, he weighed 146 for Clottey didn't he?

    I wish Roach would just shut the **** up now. All he seems to be doing is talking **** lately.
     
  5. crosseyed

    crosseyed Active Member Full Member

    672
    2
    Mar 27, 2005
    Why wouldn't it be off? If Cotto came in three pounds above the agreed upon limit and missed welterweight and was stripped of his title why would they let the fight go on?

    Cotto won't miss weight, but if he did Roach/Pacquiao have every right to pull out.
     
  6. avenel

    avenel Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,762
    1
    Aug 7, 2009
    das old and bull**** SWEAR cotto would come in afte 147 in weigh in...hes gonna make 145 without a doubt and fightnite he will be around 157
     
  7. pwright2k

    pwright2k Member Full Member

    338
    0
    Aug 5, 2009
    "Exactly, he weighed 146 for Clottey didn't he?"

    yeah, lets hope cotto doesn't weigh in at 146 for this fight. i would rather him keep his $1 million rather than give it to the pac camp. he has had to give up and give in too much already for this fight.
     
  8. r2d2

    r2d2 HATERS GONNA HATE! Full Member

    1,534
    0
    May 4, 2009
    i think roach is talking about fight night not weight in.....
     
  9. DocLouis

    DocLouis Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,127
    0
    Oct 14, 2009
    Agreed.

    Cotto will be fine. More psych-out techniques from Roach, imo.
     
  10. Lights_Out

    Lights_Out Member Full Member

    220
    0
    May 1, 2009
    read the article, its the weight in