Pac vs Fraud, I don't even care anymore...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by NullpointerAlex, Nov 28, 2011.


  1. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    :rofl they are indeed a stubborn and silly bunch.
     
  2. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    Styles make fights. I'm not denying that. You're gonna get more punches off a guy who stands in front of you. But when I pointed out how Pac threw more punches against the same guy in the past, you just ignored that point. You said his stamina is the same, but I just gave you evidence to the contrary.

    Also, it's obvious to anyone with the slightest bit of boxing intelligence to notice that Pac has declined. Stats etc aren't even really needed. All you have to do is watch his fights with Mosley and JMM and compare it to the way he fought a few years ago.

    It's pointless debating with you though. You're another nuthugger (a black American I'm guessing) who is obviously not capable of being reasonable in discussing Floyd/Pac so I guess we'll leave it at that.
     
  3. NullpointerAlex

    NullpointerAlex Active Member Full Member

    1,466
    0
    Aug 15, 2010
    Do you know nothing about boxing? Why doesn't Mayweather than just gain 7 pounds every fight and win 10 titles in 10 different weight classes, finishing up in heavyweight? :lol:

    Who cares about can/could? Did he beat floyd or did Floyd beat him? That's what's important. The theoretical questions could he or would he are futile. They're just guesses and opinions. Until they really fight in the ring, it's just speculation, it's 100% worthless. It's not like floyd is winning because now he's ranked #1....... It's still 0 to 0, they haven't fought... Fact that Pac has some losses or didn't do spectacular vs JMM means **** all in Fraud vs Pac. Until they actually fight, everything is irrelevant.

    And at this point, as I've said, I think Fraud missed the boat by not fighting Pac earlier. At this point, I don't really see a point in doing Pac vs Floyd, I'm not really interested about it anymore. It should have happened a long time ago, I've since lost interest, especially after seeing the Pac JMM fight... YMMV.
     
  4. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010

    Here take a note from this *******. Don't jump ship yet.:yep
     
  5. thawk888

    thawk888 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,967
    5
    Sep 16, 2011
    What a dick! :patsch
     
  6. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    PAC looked good agaiat margarito and cotto because they stood infrot of him you moron. PAC had just as much trouble cutting off the ring against cotto when cotto started boxing off the back foot as he did Mosley and marquez ya moron.

    Of course his punch output is gonna decrease against a counter puncher in comparison to a brawled dope. Do you know any reason as to why you don't throw more against guys who counter? :patsch

    And you see nothing different from the marque of the first two fights who exchanged wig Pac and the one who doubt him recently who didnt?
     
  7. NullpointerAlex

    NullpointerAlex Active Member Full Member

    1,466
    0
    Aug 15, 2010
    Btw, you didn't answer the question... Say they theoretically fought 100 times the same fight. How many bouts would each win about? How much % of winning the fight would you give Pac vs Floyd?
     
  8. thawk888

    thawk888 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,967
    5
    Sep 16, 2011
    It's amazing no one disrespecting Mayweather here actually addresses these very facts of the situation with those potential fights. Fights that, from what some of these idiots are posting, has kept Mayweather from true greatness. :tired
     
  9. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    :|
     
  10. Phat_Ass_Dude

    Phat_Ass_Dude Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,340
    0
    Jun 29, 2011
    C'mon dawg...Keep it real. Have you lost Interest or did reality finally kick in? Just about everybody and their Momma has been saying from the beginning that Pacquiao is nowhere near Floyd Mayweather's level. And because you refused to see the obvious and it takes two fights versus past their prime fighters (Mosley and JMM) for you to finally see the light. You've come to the conclusion that Pacquiao is no longer at his "Peak"...when the reality is, he not fighting slow-ass, stationary, easy-2-hit fighters anymore. There have been HUNDREDS of posters who have been trying to tell you this for 2 years. But you and everyone else called those posters biased, racist, *****s and much worse. And now that the truth just punched yo' *****-ass right in the face, now you have lost interest:|. Hopefully you have lost interest in ESB altogether, so we will never have to see your Punk-Ass anymore...PEACE:hi:
     
  11. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    And what about Sergio Martinez? Floyd said he wanted the winner of Martinez and Williams last year. Martinez sensationally knocked out Williams to put him in P4P #3 in the world. A fight which, if Mayweather won, would go down as one of, if not, his greatest victory. That Arum's fault too?
     
  12. Hotsauce

    Hotsauce Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,820
    26
    Jul 21, 2011
    imo manny is still in his prime

    put him in there with certain guys he looks unbeatable

    put him in there with certain guys he looks beatable
     
  13. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    You're a ******.
     
  14. ImElvis666

    ImElvis666 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,812
    3
    Jan 31, 2010
    :hi:
     
  15. NullpointerAlex

    NullpointerAlex Active Member Full Member

    1,466
    0
    Aug 15, 2010
    They're not exclusive you dolts. He gave you one example of statistical evidence that he is slowing down, yet you won't accept this unarguable statistical evidence. He never said that this proves beyond the shadow of the doubt that he is slowing down... But even if he was fighting counterpunchers and that was the ONLY reason his punch output went down, this wouldn't disprove that he's not on a decline either. Punch stats are only an indication. In this case, it indicates that he's punching less than he did in the past. :deal

    At Pac's age, it would be idiotic to affirm that he's not declining. Of course he is, he's been in many wars, it takes a toll on a boxer's body, and he's past 30, only getting older... Of course he's on his decline... Who other than an idiotic ***** would argue this fact?