Pac vs Fraud, I don't even care anymore...

You don't see any difference in how marquez chose to fight this time to the first two times ******?

 

Marquez at times brawled and exchanged with pAc in the first two fights. In his fight Marquez was a pure counter puncher and refuse to get in any exchanges. Thus PAC didn't have the same opportunity to punch. In the first two fights he boxed within a radius. In this fight he boxed off the back foot much more.

Jesus stick to dissing theists. You don't know **** about boxing.

 

i already explained this pac was more defensive in the 3rd. and yeah ***boy i am black is that a problem? i know u hate seeing black people succeed thats why floyd is #1 P4P again and your hopes of pacquiao beating him has been crushed lol now go look for another fighter who can beat this evil black monster :good lol

 

Cool, I get to quote myself from another thread....

 

I have no idea why pac fans are falling back on their man. Pac is not declined. Jesus. He fought Marquez who he always has trouble with, but this time Marquez came WELL prepared and was very discipline in this fight -- didn't get tangled up in any exchanges like he did last time.. he just boxed, countered, and made Pac miss - very disciplined. Before that Pac fought Mosley, who he looked great against until Mosley decided to "box", throw his terrible jab and run away on the backfoot for the rest of the fight. Then pac fought clottely who was content on covering up the whole time and not doing anything.

Pac is the same fighter, Marquez just fought that good.

 

That's the weird part. If you're not like every other zealot on here, why bother to make a lengthy thread to express your obvious emotional attachment to this whole ordeal? :tired

 

stop cryin about it, u admitted urself that u think floyd would of beat him anytime so who gives a **** when he does. u remind me of skip bayless

 

I've skipped the last few pages so I'm not up to date with where the discussion has gone (probably, thankfully).

But to compare Pac to the Jones that fought Calzaghe or Hopkins (in the 2nd fight) is absurd.

Pac looked the same in his last fight as he did against the same guy 4 years ago. And in between those 2 fights, has looked spectacular.

Pac may not be at his absolute peak, but to call him "past prime" or even "shot" is ridiculous.

I suppose he was 4 years ago when he fought JMM to a close SD rather than a close MD then.

 

he is only about one fighter. hating on mayweather:thumbsup

 

thank u. pac fans already have their excuses lined up in case he loses

 

Like someone said, coincidence that pac came into his prime after his "performance" against Marquez which many felt he loss only to leave his prime when he fought Marquez again, in which many felt he loss. Since he did not destroy Marquez... he MUST be well declined. Sometimes this type of stuff makes me not want to watch boxing anymore.

He was primed until he fought a boxer/ pure counter puncher again... the only Elite (pure) one he has ever fought in his entire career. He was primed when he was fighting the typical come forward/puncher style with little defense.

 

u said "u dont even care anymore" so do u think pac would have won before the marquez fight?