Pac vs Fraud, I don't even care anymore...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by NullpointerAlex, Nov 28, 2011.


  1. NullpointerAlex

    NullpointerAlex Active Member Full Member

    1,466
    0
    Aug 15, 2010
    This content is protected



    So explain to me how JMM and so many other boxers faced Pac. Seriously, Fraud's claims of "wanting to clean up the sport" were ****ing laughable. Other than moronic *****s, no one was impressed and nobody was fooled... Non-gay fighters don't have a problem facing each other in the ring, but Mayweather was glad to have a way out. He didn't want to face Pac in the ring. Basically every opponent they both faced, he beat (boringly, 12 rds), Hoya, Hatton, Pac absolutely destroyed. Even fighters May was afraid of, Pac beat too. You can't blame the guy for being scared, well actually, you can, since he was a pro prize fighter claiming to be the greatest of all time. :deal
     
  2. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    He may have beaten Cotto, Margarito and Pacquiao too but it didn't stop him from ducking them.

    Do you think he'd have beaten all three? I'm sure you do. He obviously didn't otherwise why didn't he?
     
  3. realfraud

    realfraud Guest

    :lol::lol::lol:
     
  4. jso416

    jso416 F U Nutthuggers!!! Full Member

    3,030
    1
    Sep 21, 2009
    This fight isn't happening anyway.
     
  5. NullpointerAlex

    NullpointerAlex Active Member Full Member

    1,466
    0
    Aug 15, 2010
    Exactly. What do you want to see, a guy beating a guy everybody knows he'll beat (smaller, older, past prime, not as good boxer, etc..), or do you want to see boxing matches where the top dogs fight each other?

    Mayweather is ****ing gay because he simply cherry picks opponents. He's been like the first real ****** to elevate this ***gotry to an art-form. This delusional homosexual ****** really claimed to be the best because he was undefeated. Well, like RA so eloquently said: "Undefeated don't mean ****! You got to beat the best to claim to be the best."

    Gayweather never was out to demonstrate to the world that he was the best, he was simply all about ducking fighters and not losing. He's even admitted so himself. Seriously, how can anyone be a fan of such a coward? It's sad...
     
  6. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Mosley and Oscar combined were better fighters then Cotto and Margarito. Why would he duck Margarito and Cotto but fight better skilled fighters in Oscar and Mosley.

    Sorry doesnt make sense. Seems you were blinded by the Arum hype train. I wasnt. I knew Margarito had beaten nobody of note and that Cotto was struggling against scrubs at 140.

    He didnt want to negotiate with Arum. Infact the only reason he never fought Cotto was because Arum would never negotiate for an Oscar fight. A 154lb Oscar being a much tougher opponent then 5'6 Miguel Cotto.

    this has been gone over so many times. Floyd haters will never understand simple facts. no use explaining.
     
  7. realfraud

    realfraud Guest

    :lol::lol::lol:
     
  8. NullpointerAlex

    NullpointerAlex Active Member Full Member

    1,466
    0
    Aug 15, 2010
    Seriously, the last 10 years of Mayweather were cherry picked opponents and quite lame imho... Corrales & Castillo were probably his greatest challenges in the last 10 years, and that's quite poor for someone as talented as May.... He has some big names, Hoya, Mosley, Gatti, Marquez, Judah, but they were all either smaller, past prime, older, coming off losses, etc. No real serious challenge in there, well, not to the serious boxing fan at least.

    If one thing, I guess you could say Mosley was before the fight a 'big' fight, but he just happened to gas out after 3 rounds and look really old... So yeah, even if he did look impressive vs Marg earlier, he was still old, and fought like a man of his age, and after almost knocking down/out May, ran out of juice in the first third of the fight... So I don't know how that qualifies since people just thought Mosley had it when he didn't have it anymore... I guess kudos for taking the fight (maybe he saw some things others didn't?), but at the end of the day, he fought an old man who ran out of juice after like 4 rounds........
     
  9. Cellz831

    Cellz831 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,344
    3
    Oct 21, 2011
    a lil somethin i wrote earlier that should put u pacfags in your place:

    please stop with the pacquiao excuses. mayweather is older than pacquiao and ur a fool if u think hes still in his prime. some of u say that pacquiao has slowed down, got old, and is washed up now. i didnt see any difference in pacquiaos speed, stregnth, stamina, or style when he fought marquez.

    he fought a SMART boxer. of course pacquiao is gonna look great against a slow brawler that comes straight at u like margarito aka a punching bag. u *******s fell into the hype and got a reality check.

    why is it so hard to believe that marquez who had 2 other contrevesial fights with pacquiao wouldnt be able to compete this time? did y'all really believe that "new fighter" that has a "right hand" bull**** lol.

    honestly, it sounds ur already makin excuses for pacquiao if he loses to mayweather and alot of y'all are afraid to eat your words.

    if not? prove me wrong. Tell me exactly what has changed in pacquiao from now to pre-marquez fight(de la hoya, hatton, cotto, margarito)
     
  10. jso416

    jso416 F U Nutthuggers!!! Full Member

    3,030
    1
    Sep 21, 2009
    Cotto beat Mosely ass clown.
     
  11. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    The problem is, Mayweather didn't fight Mosley and Oscar instead of Cotto and Margarito. He fought Hatton instead of Cotto and Baldomir instead of Margarito.

    Yet people like you defend that. Why? Surely you'd have preferred a Cotto and Margarito fight at the time?

    Aside from that, Floyd fought Mosley after Cotto beat a much better version.
     
  12. MichiganWarrior

    MichiganWarrior Still Slick! Still Black! Full Member

    26,793
    7
    Mar 20, 2010
    Mosley made Margarito his *****. Mayweather schooled Mosley.



    This is what I mean. You dont understand boxing. So you actually believed Cotto and Margarito were a threat to Floyd. Just like you thought Pacquiao was unbeatable.


    Mayweather has beaten much better fighters then Margarito and Cotto in his career. Mosley, Oscar, Castillo and Corrales were all better.


    Margarito lost to Daniel Santos and a green Paul Williams. His only victories were Cintron and golden Johnson Six heads journeyman whatever the ****.


    Cotto was dropping rounds at 140 to Paulie Malignaggi. Went life and death with Mosley where he had to box off the back foot and make Mosley chase him to get a razor thin W.



    Smoke and mirrors brah. Pulled in by the arum hype train. Choo Choo muther****ers. :yep
     
  13. Cellz831

    Cellz831 Obsessed with Boxing banned

    20,344
    3
    Oct 21, 2011
    please stop with the pacquiao excuses. mayweather is older than pacquiao and ur a fool if u think hes still in his prime. some of u say that pacquiao has slowed down, got old, and is washed up now. i didnt see any difference in pacquiaos speed, stregnth, stamina, or style when he fought marquez.

    he fought a SMART boxer. of course pacquiao is gonna look great against a slow brawler that comes straight at u like margarito aka a punching bag. u *******s fell into the hype and got a reality check.

    why is it so hard to believe that marquez who had 2 other contrevesial fights with pacquiao wouldnt be able to compete this time? did y'all really believe that "new fighter" that has a "right hand" bull**** lol.

    honestly, it sounds ur already makin excuses for pacquiao if he loses to mayweather and alot of y'all are afraid to eat your words.

    if not? prove me wrong. Tell me exactly what has changed in pacquiao from now to pre-marquez fight(de la hoya, hatton, cotto, margarito)
     
  14. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    67
    Mar 11, 2006
    Mayweather blatantly ducked the fighter who lost to Santos, Williams and Mosley. What does that say about Mayweather?

    Do you think he did you a favour by not fighting him? No. Everyone in the world wanted to see that fight, Mayweather fans included. If you defend him ducking Margarito, you're as big a part of the problem as Mayweather is.

    You're clearly a Mayweather slave and not a boxing fan.
     
  15. NullpointerAlex

    NullpointerAlex Active Member Full Member

    1,466
    0
    Aug 15, 2010
    :deal