How do you figure that ****, buddy? A fighter who is his most vulnerable in transtion, against a fighter who is at his best in transition, has the style advantage? A fighter who has to move in and out and set and reset, against a fighter who is at his best in perpetual motion, has the style advantage? A fighter who is at his worst backing up, against a fighter who is at his best coming forward, has the style advantge? How the **** do figure that ****?? WRONG. You could not be more WRONG. Pacquiao is going to back up, dead red, in transition, station to station, blind naked, over and over again. All Pacquiao has to do is make ONE mistake at a time. All Hatton has to is deviate a little bit here and there. Some of you people don't get ****.
Hey, relax mate..Don't let it get in to you.lol I don't know what style he's refering to. It confuses me cause thay have different style, and they're both good at their own. But I don't think Pac would just back up since he's not good at it, he will use his lateral movements and Pac has good footworks..You made it sound easy for Hatton, but its easier said than done..This fight won't be easy for either one of them..:good
Nah, your pea brain reads "easy" when it reads wordsmith. Nothing in life is easy, **** barnacle. And neither is complex theory made to sound simple - for the simple. You remember that.
speed.......pac skills.....pac stance.......pac stamina....slightly for pac because he is more professional outside training. chin....hatton heart....even experience ......pac reach....pac height.......hatton (slightly) quality of opponents.....pac
Got to be the most biased post ever........ and how did you work out southpaw was an advantage, never heard that before surely even personally like fighting southpaw's!!
PAC-Hatton advantages/disadvantages: ....................Speed - PAC ......................Skills - They both got skills. Pac is not Floyd Mayweather Style (same as skills) - Same Aggressive come forward style ...................Stance - Southpaws can leave themselves open to straight right hands (ala, Clottey vs Judah) so its not an advantage but it can be. ..................Stamina - Same, dont get it twisted. .......................Chin - How can you say Pac, he's been knocked out by unknown entities lol .....................Heart - Again, how can you just say PAC. I would say they both got the same desire to win ..............Experience - Explain how Pac has more experience, stop being so biased. ....................Reach - I dont know either's measurements so cannot comment ...........Height/Taller - I dont know either's height so cannot comment Quality of Opponents - HATTON, When Pac has fought someone of quality at 140 then come back and tell me, but for now you dont get much better than Mayweather, Collazo, Castillo etc... .......Ring Generalship - Both the same, again PAC IS NOT MAYWEATHER HE LOST TO MARQUEZ MATE, MARQUEZ OUTBOXED THE KIDD .........Corner/Trainer - Both the same, they both got quality trainers. .......................Size - HATTON .......................Age - DONT KNOW THEIR AGES ...................Weight - HATTON IS NATURALLY A BIGGER GUY ....................Power - HATTON PROBABLY HITS HARDER, HE IS NATURALLY BIGGER You obviously didn't think about what you was posting before posting
I'm talking in PAC's case... He's been criticized not having good balance but still very successful in winning fights... Imagine if PAC has an excellent balance? That's why I sarcastically asked "Is balance important?"... .
Southpaws regularly faced right handers so they're used to it... Right handers rarely faced southpaws... That's the southpaw advantage... .