Pac vs Hatton, the very first clinch.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PH|LLA, May 9, 2009.


  1. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    hahaha how can anyone argue with this blatant lunacy?

    Spam Rafail, you are the Inspector Clouseau of ESB :lol:
     
  2. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    :rofl
     
  3. retriever

    retriever Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,057
    29
    Jan 20, 2006
  4. teke

    teke Titans Time !!! Full Member

    15,472
    0
    Jul 31, 2004
    I did notice Hattons very first combo was a punch to the nuts :-:)lol:
     
  5. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    :lol::lol::lol:
     
  6. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Why are you always trying to play it so safe, IrnBruWoman? Does babbling nonsense and playing the cracked up internet forum clown give you some deep satisfaction or some ****? You spend HOURS doing this stuff with a rotating list of different members, BANNING after BANNING. Get your kicks, funny man. A ****ing 8 year old is more sophisticated.. :rofl I'll be seeing you until you get bounced off. AGAIN. And then the next time. :yep
     
  7. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    :lol:

    What are you on about?

    You're an idiot, always putting your foot in it with your bull**** and then compounding your errors by arguing with everyone.

    I find you quite entertaining.

    Fact is, Philla said when Manny walked Hatton back to the centre of the ring, he believed that was the sign that Hatton had no chance of winning.

    You then came in and stated that Manny walking Hatton back was illegal, yet 10 pages later you're trying to claim you agreed (sorry) Philla agreed with YOU (spam raFail) all along :lol:

    It's all here in this thread in black and white, yet when I quoted consecutive posts between you and Philla and you and Bula pointing it out, you tried to hide behind the claim that I quoted them 'out of context'.

    Ah, 'out of context', the politician's escape clause :yep

    Carry on, you crazy-as-a-shithouse-rat mother****er :lol:
     
  8. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Absolute HORSE**** NONSENSE. :lol: You didn't even finish that FRAGMENT. Way to DUCK, *****.

    Ya ****ing MORON. I reminded someone of the POINT OF THE THREAD. This thread is not about me, CRYBABY. :rofl Funny how you come down on the other side of EVERY issue ever since I SLAPPED YOU AROUND LIKE THE ***** YOU ARE. Who are you trying to impress, ****? I've been telling you about this DICKRIDING for months. :rofl I'm sure it's somehow legitimate this time. :roll: Give me some more EXCUSES. :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl
     
  9. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member

    79,438
    2,647
    Feb 1, 2007
    just let the thread die already.
     
  10. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Okay, let's take babysteps (this oughtta be good :yep)

    I want you to explain exactly what you are saying in the above exchange with Philla, who was the thread starter.

    :DD:
     
  11. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Naw man, I reckon Spam raFail might just dig his way to China with a tad more encouragement :yep
     
  12. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    OK, IrnBruWoman, even though you should have let the ****ing thread die... And you've been hoping and praying to get me on JUST ONE DESPERATE THING for MONTHS and MONTHS, and working on this for HOURS here tonight... We're going to solve this for you, sweetheart; PHILLA and I agreed that the move was ILLEGAL. GET IT? PHILLA and I did NOT agree that this moment of shoving Hatton back was MORAL VICTORY for Pacquiao.

    CAN YOU FOLLOW ALL THAT, OR ARE YOU JUST TOO ****ING STUPID TO UNDERSTAND? You see, you ONE DIMENSIONAL APE, We BOTH AGREED and DISAGREED on different things, such is life. STUPID ****WAD. :rofl Please don't tell me you went through all this trouble JUST to catch me contradicting myself over what we DID and DID NOT agree on. Just...

    PATHETIC :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl


    OWNED
     
  13. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    "Spam Rafail" is a legitimate poster on this site. Not some pointless TROLL like yourself jumping into every thread which contains myself, BigReg, or someone else who has gotten the better of you in arguments, just to SPAM and PESTER.

    DIE *****. :yep
     
  14. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    The mother****er spent almost ONE HOUR prepping for his last post. :blood

    This has got to be the worst case of SELF-OWNAGE I have ever witnessed. HANDS DOWN. :yikes
     
  15. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Philla stated that he believed when Manny pushed Hatton back off the ropes in the first 15-20 seconds of the fight, that was when he (Philla) knew Hatton had no chance of beating Manny.

    Philla's thread wasn't about the legality of it.

    And where does Philla agree with you that it was illegal? Here?

    Nope, he's just saying that you say it's illegal.

    The fact that Philla was embarrassed enough for you to explain what you were saying (because you were trying so hard to be elliptical and mysterious about it all) is nothing to get excited, obnoxious, arrogant, and overly emoticon-al over :yep

    This is no trouble for me at all Spammy, it's not hard :lol:

    Likewise, I haven't been waiting for you to **** up - you're here all the time laying down your unique brand of ****ed upness, I can swing in any time I like and have a go at you :yep