Pac vs Hatton, the very first clinch.

One would think I had done bad things to you Spammy, such is the vitriol directed towards me in your posts :hey:yep

Stop 'recruiting', surely you're man enough to handle this yourself without trying to bring FatReggie into it? :think

 

Naw mang, I'm not sitting here 24/7 waiting for replies like you do - I have a life :hey

I figure I can drop a reply in here, and log off and do stuff for an hour or so (in this case having lunch) before checking back in to see your multiple frothing-at-the-mouth replies to my posts :yep

Carry on

 

You're always DISHONEST, IrnBruWoman, that's the one thing truly makes you a tasteless SACK OF ****. It gets REALLY ****ing old with the STALKING and popping into every thread posting up everybody you're harrasssing and BLABBING argumentative nonsense to make it look like you're actually trying to make a point. You need to get hit by a car. Soon.

 

****ing RIGHT!? That's why you come back with all these posts and hairbrained ideas. Quit LYING, woman.

 

ABSOLUTE BULL**** REACHING. I expect nothing less.

 

Not True.

There are worse on here.


There's ............


Let me see, I know who's worse........


Can't remember his name....








Well, Poly, you're just plain wrong.

He's not the biggest tool on ESB.


There's at least two... Maybe three... Bigger tools.


I just can't remember their names.

 

Dude, don't you realise how obvious it is when you refuse to answer my posts and instead hide behind false outrage?

Do you deny Philla started this thread to point out that when he saw Manny push Hatton back off the ropes in the first 15-20 seconds of the fight, that was the point when he thought Hatton had no chance of beating Pacman?

You replied and stated it was illegal and in fact an error on Manny's part, then you argued with various other posters who questioned your claims, and your answer to them was not a word of explanation, but rather "watch it again".

Eventually Philla explained it with "basically he's saying its illegal to clinch and push your opponent backwards." This does not equate to Philla agreeing with you, don't you know? :nut

You neither confirmed nor denied this, but instead rolled along with more abuse towards anyone who disagreed with you, and more claims of your Lordship of the Ring

One can only assume you refused to provide any explanation of your claims because:

a) you are incapable of actually explaining your wild claims;

b) you really don't know what you're talking about but crave to come across as being knowledgeable, so you hint here and there of greater knowledge but run when asked to substantiate your claims;

c) you are a lonely old man who tries to engage in arguments with people because even being abused means people are at least acknowledging your pathetic existence;

d) all of the above

God knows why I'm even bothering, as I stated earlier - how can anyone argue with the ****ed up 'logic' you operate on - but I'm actually really interested in hearing your explanation of how a thread about Manny asserting himself over Hatton in the first 20 seconds of round 1 became all about your opinion that Manny used an illegal tactic :hey :yep

Go on, see if you can man up and answer that, instead of hiding behind CAPS and OMG!!!!111!!!!!! OWNAGE!!!!! etc.

Can you Spammy?

 

All I see here is a whole lot of crying and not much else.

:|:|:|:|:|

 

:|:|:|:|:|

Anything to avoid actually explaining your claims, eh Spammy? :hey

Actually, since you've accused me of dishonesty and lying these past 2 posts, it'd be pretty good if you could provide an example of said dishonesty and lying.

I mean, if I'm so dishonest and such a liar, surely it wouldn't be hard for you to locate a post where I've been dishonest and/or lied, gnome sane?

Go on, let's see if you can back up any of your claims in this thread Spammy :hey

 

Feeling DESPERATE?

 

I thought so :yep

Someone's feeling DESPERATE, that's for sure :yep

I'm out for the night, so you've got 12 hours to answer my questions Spammy

 

RUNNING AWAY AGAIN. BIG ****ing surprise. :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

It's a crying shame the way you boys cyber-bully poor San.

Pounding the **** out of him with and logic and reason and facts and such.

He can't help it if he's a little under-developed in those departments. It's the way he was hatched. He probably has strengths in some other areas to compensate, areas like creativity.

For example, I think he has a very vivid imagination.

And still, showing no mercy, nor Christian charity, all the big lads on this thread just continue to OWN the poor lad's ass, over and over again.

And don't try the excuse that he owns frequently himself !

I know he does, but you shouldn't laugh when some poor sod does that.

He just knows no better.


You could have been born that way yourself.

Shame!

 

That's some "logic" and "reason" you're backing, SFB. :rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

LOL... The Calzaghe Fangirl Club is in full effect. Save it for a different thread.

You're another one of this SPINLESS ***GOTS who want to claim "owned" on a guy that has been OWNING people left and right, ESPECIALLY your LIMEY BUTT BUDDY here. BRILLIANT. But UNMOVING. BE FUNNY at least, ****.

 

Limey ???

Who would that be then ?



You poor sorry little ****er !

Them bad old cyber-bullies have ****ed you so hard up the arse that they've addled your brains.

(Wouldn't have happened though, if your brains weren't IN your arse !)


Still, not your fault.

You was just made that way, through no fault of your own.

I'll pray for you, son. And I'll take up your case whenever I see any of them bigger-brained posters pickin' on you, on account of your limited grasp of...



....well, everything!

Don't give up hope !