Pac vs Hatton, the very first clinch.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by PH|LLA, May 9, 2009.


  1. nezy37

    nezy37 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,241
    0
    Jul 13, 2007
    He had no chance when the fight was signed.
     
  2. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    The first punch Pac landed which was within the first 30 seconds, Hatton froze for a second, I knew there he won't be able to handle the power. Then Pac lands a similar shot with Hatton getting in and Hatton is hurt.

    Pac just proved in the first round that he has serious power and Hatton didn't have any plan B to fight out of it and he never really had a plan B in his career, he just fights one way. Two sessions with Mayweather won't change that.
     
  3. Scar

    Scar VIP Member

    76,131
    2,773
    Jul 20, 2004
    Many people thought he did, this fight was considered a 50/50 fight by the majority of fans. Pacquiao just shocked people with the power he showed.
     
  4. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    :rofl.....Indeed. We saw what the prep was.

    It was totally effective, but a bit desperate. That's not what they had in mind, clearly.

    What do you think, bud?
     
  5. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,254
    109
    Sep 29, 2008
    I cant believe how strong he is at 140
     
  6. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Funny ****, *****.

    I was right about ALL kinds of things.
     
  7. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006

    like predicting that hatton would beat up pac? :huh
     
  8. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,376
    309
    Jan 8, 2009

    yes, what i don't understand is why posters here think the fight is 50/50
     
  9. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    :rofl
     
  10. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    All Pac did was to untangle himself from Hatton's clinch which was quite easy, btw, which I don't was illegal. Clinching is the illegal tactic employed in he first place. Do you have double standard rules, San Rafael? Never was Pac endangered from that first and last clinch which backed Pac on the ropes.
     
  11. Soriano

    Soriano Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,949
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    San Rafael, please explain your avy. Did you lose in an avatar bet?:huh
     
  12. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Here goes Enzo getting sophmoric again. :lol:

    Yeah, Enzo, picking the winner was very complex. Sure, buddy. My girlfriend did that too. I guess she knows more about boxing than I do. :cool: If you want to put your details on the table and establish your understanding of what would transpire for the fight took place be my ****ing guest. I fully admit I had no idea Pacquiao's power would have such an effect. That was my bad. I'm very pleased with other details however. Understanding the finer points is my thing, the outcome is it's own harsh master.
     
  13. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    Correct. Courtesy of Realspitts.
     
  14. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    This guy san rafael is the biggest tool on ESB.

    I guarantee he'll waffle endlessly, taking tiny bits of information completely out of context, pathetically trying to convince somebody he actually knows da **** he's talking about, with generous doses of teenage keyboard warriordom thrown in, *****!

    :lol:
     
  15. san rafael

    san rafael 0.00% lemming Full Member

    27,684
    7
    Jun 11, 2008
    I thought you would like that. ;)