PAC vs. JMM : Who has the better resume?

Exactly. And some people still ignore that simple fact, pretending that Pac could've fought better competitions than those 3.

 

pac, and its not even close

 

They should be called the four blind mice!

I doubt if they identify themselves. Unless they are ready to defend themselves that jmm indeed has a better resume than pac.

I ALREADY simplified the resume of jmm

A) JMM won over prime MAB
B) JMM won over ULTRA prime CASA :rofl
C) JMM managed to get a D courtesy of the stupid or error of the judge

THAT's about it FOLKS!

I would not be surprised if divac, uliuli are two or the four who voted for jmm!

 

It's beyond comparison.

Who's taking ex-world champs as tune up fights or keep busy fights?

 

Even tho I scored their last fight for JMM, Ive got to give resume to Pacman.

The best common opponent that each men have fought was Barrera & Pac destroyed MAB in 03 then beat him by UD close but clear in 07.
JMM beat MAB by SD in 07 also which should have been a UD IMO but still not as clear as Pac beat him both times.

Dont forget that Pac twice stopped a better fighter than any Marquez opponent - Morales of course.
Dont get me wrong, Marquez would likely have beat the versions of Morales that Pac beat but its highly unlikely he`d do it as convincingly & at the end of the day, he didnt because he didnt fight him so Pac has the better resume IMO.

 

JMM is a better boxer, Pac has the better resume though fough Barrera and Morales at good times when they were past peak.

 

pac dy depatitation. before fighting pac, jmm fought no one of high regard. while pac has faced sasakul at 112 and ledwaba at 122 who were both at the top of their divisions. the best thing in jmm's resume is the draw with pac, accept it or not.

 

Better reume Pac. better Boxer and fighter JMM.

 

So when he fought JMM he went back as primier. Seems your memory is not serving you right.

 

even if you take off the big three from Pac's resume it isnt that far behind JMM's

 

If you readly know BOXING you know JMM Won so STFU.:deal

 

better resume-pac
better boxer-jmm
better fighter-pac.

there, fair enough?

 

Interesting! probably it would be better to say, better description for jmm but not a better fighter. How can you be a better fighter if you can't show your achievments through your resume?

How can you prove that you are a better fighter if your resume is full of class B fighters?!

So it's better if you would say.. Jmm is this and that! jmm is the most gifted boxer EVER! but at the end of the day... all those are mere DESCRIPTIONS of the said fighter...it boils down to one thing?!

Aside from the fancy descriptions of your fans what IS THE ACHIEVMENT TO TALK ABOUT?!

Remember the A, B and C I talked about earlier?!

Once thing is for sure good writers can describe you, are make you this and that correct?! Great writers can even describe you as the best ever boxer..

Now, if you are the best boxer HOW COME YOUR RESUME DOES NOT SHOW IT?!

Then you go back to the basics, which is the greatest achievement of JMM a, b or c?!

 

You can alter the image with the power of the PEN. But you can't alter the ACTUAL ACHIEVEMENTS!

Unless you want to HYPE the likes of JACA and SALIDO!

 

How come a betterer boxer and fighter become better when his highest performance to less better is only draw? logic.