Pac weighed 106lbs when he was 16yrs old!!

Pac doesn't even looked ripped anymore. He's more puffy these days which would suggest natural weight gain through protein shakes, extra meals, etc. As hard as Pac works, no way that would be the case if he was on roids and just building muscle

 

Tommy Hearns.

Tommy, who most (including Leonard) agree, beat Leonard in a SMW title fight (his FOURTH weight class) and went up another two weight classes after that, and won tiltles in both.

When Tommy beat the unbeaten Virgil Hill, he had gained 29 lbs since the first Leonard fight , 9.5 years earlier, a gain of 20 %


When Pac beat Cotto, he had gained 22 lbs since winning a 122 lb belt from Barotillo, 9.5 years earlier, a gain of 18 %


You just blew the hitman's chances of getting in the the hall of fame.

By your very shrewd, scientific methodology, you've proven he was on PEDS !

 

I was 95 lbs at age 17 and 160-165 lbs in my mid 30s. But I have been on a-side meth.

 

Nothing wrong but lets not talk about age! I am older than dirt!

 

Actually when Pac was 16 years old, he was fighting in the light flyweight division only weighing 98 pounds. Pac said he would put weights in his pockets to come in heavier a the scales.

 

of course you know his birth weight.

obsession to the fullest.

 

Asians are typically smaller at birth than caucasians.

Typical caucasian male neonate is 3.5 kilograms, while among asians, filipinos especially, 3 kilograms is the norm.

Of course you won't know that because all you do is suck Gayweather's d**k.

Only a ***** would use weigh gain as evidence of PEDS use. That really shows how limited really your collective IQ's is.

 

Again, Diva is twisting facts to suit his scenario.

The maths are actually almost parallel.

At 16, both weighed at or near 106 pounds. Start from there. Except that Fraud used steroid earlier so he step in at 130 pounds earlier.

 

You dont read very well do you.

I'm specifically asking you name a fighter that was as dominant past that 3rd weight class than he had been prior.
Clearly Hearns was'nt nearly as dominant past the 160 lbs weight range.



.......and while we're speaking of Hearns and fighters who are succesful moving up past their best weight.
I've stated in this forum many times that fighters like Mayweather defense and skill, and Hearns freakish physical characteristics (huge height and reach advantage even against the light heavyweights he was facing) plus the boxing skill to go along with it. These type of styles are more apt to be sucessful even in a weight class where physically, the other fighters are naturally stronger.

Hearns was never dominant past the 160 lbs weight class.......and past 160 lbs, he never KO'd anyone of note.

My contention for awhile now has been that Pacquiao is just as dominant now in his 8th weight class, than he's ever been.
Not even the physical freak Thomas Hearns for all the skill he had did that!:deal




You *******s leave yourself wide open in these discussions.
This is too easy!:yep:bbb

 

You are'nt doing Pacroid any favors by disclosing this!:tong

 

Your point is frankly, laughable. It doesn't even require refutation. To seriously entertain it, implies that just because no-one else has been able to achieve at the level of Pac, it can't be done.

If you were even passingly familiar with logic, you would recognize the giant holes in that reasoning.



And even setting that aside, your point was still shreded.

The relative dominance of the two men can be debated. Hearns had lost a step or two to Father Time when he got up there.

And splitting the difference in the levels of their respective dominance is fatuous.

Hearns won title fights in three more divisions (above his best three) against three very good fighters, including ATG Leonard and unbeaten virgil Hill.

I'd say that demonstrated a fair level of dominance for an old man.

But then, by your reasoning, he must have been juicing.


And I didn't even need to go back to the tar baby, who won titles from Light to Heavy.




And what the **** are you even trying to say here ?

That's a jumbled mish-mash of words with no discernible meaning wahtsoever.

And you talk of reading skills ?

You'd need psychic skills to pull a point out of that gibberish.

Been drinking tonight ?

It's very obvious who the '**** is here.

You tossed out a question, had it answered, and came back grasping at sophistry and semantics.

Your point was clear and was refuted even more clearly.



I'll let you read it again.

Maybe it'll sink in better with several readings.



When Tommy beat the unbeaten Virgil Hill, he had gained 29 lbs since the first Leonard fight , 9.5 years earlier, a gain of 20 %


When Pac beat Cotto, he had gained 22 lbs since winning a 122 lb belt from Barotillo, 9.5 years earlier, a gain of 18 %.

So much for your 'impossible weight gain' theories !




And this laughably childish epilogue ?

That's like a boxer smirking at an opponent who just rocked him.


Put away the bottle; You're embarrassing yourself, even by your standards.
Get some sleep, and come back when you've achieved some minimal level of coherence.
:-(

 

Diva on PMS again?

 

Either that or he's been playn' in the Kalifornia sand again.

This content is protected

 

op

 

lmao @ Mr. 'On The Cutting Edge of Popular Culture' here..