Pacaquaio VS. Salvador Sanchez @ feather weight Who Ya Got!!

You P-tards are a classic...you swarm all over these threads and the most you can contribute is that "Pac never wins these matchups"...everyone hates Pac blah blah blah :|

Really if thats the best you can come up with then dont bother typing anything next time.

 

ok pac KTFO sanchez at 130. can you refute that? bottomline is these are fantasy matches. it never happened and it will never happen.

 

Then whats the point of being a fan of boxing if you arent going to even try to discuss things like this. You just show your lack of knowledge on anything outside of Pac and no one takes you seriously.

I can easily refute that actually...because a featherweight Danny Lopez hit harder then even a 130 Manny P and he couldnt do anything to Sal...A featherweight Wilfredo Gomez is more skilled then any version of Pac and almost as fast..Sal took care of him quite easily.
A featherweight Azumah Nelson is stronger and more durable then a 130 Manny...and Sal dealt with that aswell.

Manny just wasnt the finished product yet at 126 whereas Sanchez was one of the most complete fighters the division has ever seen...Even a nuthugger like you could see that.

 

how many fights did sanchez have at 130?

 

He doesnt need to weigh higher then 126 to beat a 130 Pac. :smooch

 

you can be a boxing fan by just watching fights and not conclude who would win based on your assumption. boxing is not an exact science. why would a less skillful fighter win against a more skillful one?

how are you so sure about all of these? if sanchez handled individually all these assets in those fighters, how sure are we that he can handle well someone like pac or maybe a marquez? look gomez is a great fighter but pac might have already surpassed him and soon jmm will.

at 126 sanchez was a beast, but how are we certain he can handle 130? bottomline, these are fantasies. and everybody is entitled to their own conclusion but do not force unto others your beliefs and ridicule them if they think of a different outcome.

 

so it goes back to my original post. everybody is entitled to their own fantasy. :good

 

Pac by KO

 

Salvador Sanchez fought most of his career at featherweight. He won the WBC Featherweight Title by KO'ing Danny "Little Red" Lopez in 13 by TKO and again by TKO14. He also beat:

- Ruben Castillo - 47-1 by UD15
- Juan LaPorte - 15-1 by UD15
- Wilfredo Gomez - 32-0-1 by TKO8
- Azumah Nelson - 13-0 by TKO15

Pacquiao fought at featherweight three times beating:

- Marco Antonio Barrera - TKO11
- Juan Manuel Marquez - D12
- Fahsan 3K Battery - TKO4

Salvador Sanchez in the two years that he was featherweight champion defended his title 9 times.

Salvador Sanchez was a great counterpuncher with a very long reach for his weight class and was a better counterpuncher than Juan Manuel Marquez ever was. If Pacquiao had massive problems with Marquez' style he would never be able to figure Sanchez out. Also, Sanchez had power in both hands, had a great jab, great defense and had better foot movement than Marquez.

Pacquiao would make a fight of it for a couple of rounds but he would get countered all night long and get stopped in the later rounds while being far behind in the scorecards.

 

puga,

pacquiao ko's sanchez at 130? are you crazy or crazy? pacquiao got beat by a ringworn morales and got a very welcomed gift over marquez and you think he could have beaten the sanchez who was a better tactician, fighter and boxer than both?. we're not talking an old sanchez here, we're talking of a 23 year old sanchez who beat the likes of ruben castillo in his prime, azumah nelson in his prime, wilfredo gomez in his prime and danny "little red" lopez twice, in his prime.

dude, you really don't know your boxing don't you? i guess you're just another one of those ignorant *******s with no brains!!! :nut

 

out of great respect to sanchez i went for pac by decision , although pac by stoppage tickles me. pac stopped barerra and morrales twice , really should have a 1st rd tko over marquez. stopped delahoya and hatton , i wonder if sanchez could have done that , only died 23.
for his amount of time , he was great , but who knows , he just could have faded quickly later if he was still alive.
basically the same case with mcclellan , i'm sure that peeman , etc consider sanchez way above mcclellan from some reason.
remember that mcclellan didn't turn pro prior to 21 because he wanted to participate in the 1988 olympics , who knows what he would have achieved if turned pro aged 16 like sanchez.
pac is much more proven than sanchez.

 

As usual frank there is just so much wrong with your post I dont know where to begin.

 

sure. how can you know? darchinyan was a monster at fly, i'm sure he would dominate bantam also. gomez himself was unstopable at 122, he would probably massacre sanchez at 126. rafa was superb at 118, i'm sure he would sweep the oppositions at jr. feather.

so its a given now that if you dominate a division, you can easily move up a division north. whew, boxing experts!

 

frankenfrank,

i believe the TS wanted to know salvador sanchez/pacquiao at featherweight. at featherweight it's no contest. pacquiao gets eaten up alive by sanchez' counters all night long! :nut

 

puga,

how do i know? because sanchez was so much better than pacquiao it's not even debatable!!! i think sanchez would beat pacquiao in what ever weight class they fought in because sanchez was just the better fighter, period.