Pacaquaio VS. Salvador Sanchez @ feather weight Who Ya Got!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Da Chin Chekka, Jun 20, 2009.


  1. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007

    lol. ok, pac at 140 vs sanchez at 126? :lol:
     
  2. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,031
    18,308
    Jul 29, 2004

    Because Nelson and Gomez were better then Marquez and Pac at 126..not even hard to spot.


    Because its stupid to suggest that 4 pounds is going to make that much of a difference to a fighter of Sanchez's frame and ability..Sal fought above 126 a couple of times and the consensus was he had the body to move to lightweight if he had not died. I really didnt think that needed explaining.

    Im not forcing anything on anyone...But there is nothing constructive or intelligent whatsoever by saying "Pac never wins these matchups" so therefore you must not discuss them.
    Your being ridiculous by sticking your head in the sand and pretending there is no one nor ever has been anyone better then Manny.

    If someone came in here and tried to at least argue for Pac with a decent analysis Id respect that a hell of a lot more. But those uneducated whiny ***** comments deserve ridicule.

    As I said if you got nothing to add but that..just dont post in these threads..There are plenty of other Pac ones for you.
     
  3. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    disagreed. marquez and pac's resume combined at 126 were better than nelson and gomez combined at 126. what has gomez done at 126?

    sanchez do have a big frame for a feather and could have moved-up to 130 had he not died but we don't know how he would react to the extra weight if he ever fight an elite like arguello. it's not that sure.

    in the first place, i am not for these fantasy match-ups because it always put the assumed lesser skilled fighter in a lose situation. yes even if pac is pitted against an assumed inferior fighter like, lets say hamed. it's ok to put your opinion but if you started saying that it would be impossible for A to beat B and then ridicule him for an opposing opinion, there is no chance for the other guy to disprove it because these fight will never happen. it's more fruitful discussing actual fights that will happen. at least there's a chance to disprove a supposed to be an expert's claim.

    sanchez would probably beat pac at 126 but not without a hard fight. it would not be a stoppage. jmm landed those bombs on pac but pac never even went down. it would probably be a UD decision something like morales1. at 130 and above pac takes this. pac was more improved and versatile. uses his right hand more and is more defensively aware. besides sanchez is unproven at 130.
     
  4. Spit Bucket

    Spit Bucket Member Full Member

    274
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    im no pacfan but youre saying that if sanchez went up to 140 and fought the version of pac today he'd still beat him? i highly doubt it

    the problem w/ sanchez is he died too soon...we dont know what his limits are and most of his fans simply take it to as high as they could imagine

    126 sanchez vs 126 version of pac... edge goes to sanchez and id say he wins 8 out of 10 times
     
  5. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    true
     
  6. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,554
    18,243
    Oct 7, 2006
    Worse, He's *******ed. He takes that as a compliment though. :deal
     
  7. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,554
    18,243
    Oct 7, 2006
    :rofl

    Erik Morales who can't even carry Sanchez' jockstrap beat Pac, hell that was a shot Morales!!!

    Think about what a master boxer puncher like Sal does to Pac, think baout it dude.

    Who knows what would have happened at 140, we may never know because since Pac left 130 he hasn't faced any fighters that are REMOTELY close to the skill that Sanches had, and when I say remotely, I'm being generous to Pac.
     
  8. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,554
    18,243
    Oct 7, 2006

    :patsch:patsch:patsch

    Damn *******s are seriously too *******ed to have a reasonable conversaton with :-(

    Sanchez was 23 when he died. Pac was 122 when he was Sanchez' age. Whose to say as big a frame Sanchez had , he wouldn;t be able to fight siccesfully at 140???

    I'll tell you this, being the Warrior that Sanxhez was, he would not be like Pac but instead look to fight the best in every division. :deal
     
  9. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    stop spamming idiot.
     
  10. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,554
    18,243
    Oct 7, 2006
    :|

    :D I LOVE that you NEVER have any real responses to my posts. ;)

    The difference between my posts and yours, are that mine make sense. :hi:
     
  11. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    ok, mantacougar said sanchez will beat pac at any weight. who would you pick between sanchez and the current version of pac at 140? sanchez is great but do not put him on a god-like status like amsterdam did to mijarez. :hi:
     
  12. Spit Bucket

    Spit Bucket Member Full Member

    274
    0
    Jul 7, 2007
    well the other side would also say...he barely got by a one dimensional one eyed NOT prime pac

    they could also play that game ya know :yep
     
  13. IsaL

    IsaL VIP Member Full Member

    50,554
    18,243
    Oct 7, 2006
    1st off your stupid for even putting Sanchez and Mijares on the same sentence the way you did.

    2ndly, Sanchez is way more skilled than Pacquiao, and I wouldn't doubt one minute, as big fram as Sanchez had that he would have been able to succesfully fight at 140.

    Sal Sanchez' skills were leagues above todays Pac. Sanchez being able to succesfully campaign at 140, then I don't see how Pac would win.

    Hell, Pac hasn't fought anyone that is remotely close to Sanchez' skill level EVER, especially recently.
     
  14. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    could have, should have, would have. pac is proven at 130 and above. cannot say the same for sanchez. could have, should have, would have. :yep
     
  15. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Pac would crush the poor featherweight.