PacDbest chances of Pac vs Mayweather now?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by DobyZhee, Dec 8, 2007.


Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Just now. It's on the first page. He JUST said it....even after seeing this fight.
     
  2. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    Thanks. I can't believe it. :patsch :patsch :patsch
     
  3. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Unfortunately, I can believe it. For some reason he thinks Pacquiao is going to continue getting faster and stronger as he moves up. I dunno what to tell him. Can't make a rational counter argument to something as irrational as that.
     
  4. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    Pac-PBF is still 2 years in the Making. Be Patient.

    How about this... If Pac doesn't Blow out JMM in March . I'll stop Pushing for this fight.:hi:
     
  5. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,027
    Feb 19, 2007
    lol, hits like a middle weight? lol. can you even imagine what a middle weight would have done to jmm if he hit him the way pac did. and jmm still got up and taught pac a thing or two about the sport. for the first time in a long time i am at a loss for words to describe how ridiculous it all sounds. please tell me youve learned more than that in the last few months and you are just playing around. please tell me.
     
  6. PacDbest

    PacDbest Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,181
    1
    May 7, 2006
    Check the Pac trend from 112-130. Did he slowed down of did he get weak????:hi:
     
  7. kg0208

    kg0208 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,031
    6
    Aug 8, 2005
    Yes....from 122 to 130, he has slown down and doesn't hit as hard. He used to be a one punch KO fighter. He no longer has that type of power.

    112 doesn't matter, he was fighting smaller guys and was not fully grown yet. If you are unable to see this while others can, well that is a problem you will have to deal with. However, even then, the jump to 147 is certainly different. He will reach his limits, possibly already has. You have alot to learn.
     
  8. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    Your analysis or whatever you call it.....it was really stupid don't you think.
     
  9. Thinman

    Thinman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,474
    3
    Aug 12, 2005
    What if JMM makes Pac look like and idiot on March 15? Would you stop making all this stupid coments?
     
  10. omgwow

    omgwow Guest

    oh cmon.. i'm a pacfan and i'm filipino.. but pac will not sniff the #1 p4p status as long as mayweather is around

    there will be no pbf-pac fight.. but if there was.. it will be a pbf-pac massacre.. pac started @ 106lbs and mayweather started @130.. and mayweather is much much faster.. it's not even POSSIBLE.
     
  11. lillarry

    lillarry Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,978
    0
    May 13, 2007
    Im curious to know whats your year end p4p rankings?
     
  12. magik10

    magik10 New Member Full Member

    63
    0
    Jun 4, 2007
    Pac takes too many hits as is. Floyd would destory him. PBF's defense is a masterpiece and PacMan cannot penetrate it. He'll take too many clean shots trying and get KO'd.
     
  13. hellblazer

    hellblazer All-Time Greatâ„¢ Full Member

    5,509
    0
    Feb 25, 2006
    PBF will stop Pac in 8th or 9th round.
     
  14. BoardBULLY

    BoardBULLY Member Full Member

    404
    0
    May 8, 2005
    lol.. im abig pacman fan and I DEFINITELY WOULDNT ORDER THAT MISMATCh.. too many guys in pbf's weightclass who would give better fight.. pac vs pbf would be a massaacre...
     
  15. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    let mayweather fight cotto next and let pacquiao fight marquez.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.