Pacdbest Take on Soto-Guzman. I smell an Upset!!!!

:-( I am disappointed to read stuff like this from you.:-(

 

and after all of that, soto got schooled and guzman won. What was that you were smelling, something about an upset? lol. Yeah you were really spot on about the upset. Everything else you pointed out made no difference whatsover. so what guzman can't hurt soto, he still shut him out. so what soto's right landed every now and then, it didnt do **** to guzman. So what if guzman's face was swollen, he still shut out soto and wasnt hurt. Oh and btw, some fighters have their faces swell or bruise easily. What exaclty are you trying to say anyways? It seems like you are still defending your 'upset' pick. lol:rofl :rofl . Oh and on another note - Guzman did not stink out the place the last 6 rounds. He was just schooling the **** out of soto cause your boy couldnt do **** to him.

 

Pacdbest, you had a good analysis but you picked the wrong guy and the wrong way in which the fight would end.

You underestimated Guzman's boxing ability.

Ain't nothing wrong with being wrong from time to time.

 

You aren't amazed by anything but KO's. Guzman won that fight cleanly. And he looked good doing it (except the showboating at the end).

Actually, your analysis was completely off. Soto could barely land to the head, and did most of his damage to the body. He was beaten to the punch and countered all night, just like myself and many said he would. The key to the fight was not Soto's staight right. It was the mismatch in hand and foot speed.

People are disappointed because you mention your Donaire prediction every day and use it as a catalyst and prop to prove you are right on things no one else agrees with you on. Consistantly you will say something that is considered more than a little off, then you will say "People said I was crazy for picking Donaire" as though it validates your new point because you were right that time when others said you were wrong. However, when you get one wrong, and this isn't your first, you never just say "Props to the winner." There are always excuses and criticism. You are so quick to brag (and you do ALOT, so much so that you asked if others changed their pick because of yours) but show little humility when wrong.

 

ewww PacDBest, you just got ****ing owned by Kg0208. Just start calling him dad.

 

lol a draw. I seriously doubt the associated press scored it a draw and if they did, I will never take them seriously ever again.

 

While I think PacDBest thinks way too highly of Pacquiao I do almost agree with him here. I did the round by round for another website and scored it 115-113. I started a poll just a few minutes ago if anyone wants to use it. Guzman fought very spotty and at least Soto was trying to come forward, but he was hardly effective enough to give him serious consideration for a win.

 

If Guzman didn't think he was Whitaker in the last 3 rounds, it would have been a blow out. As it is, I scored it 116-112. But Soto had little to do with the fight being closer than it was IMO. It was all Guzman BSing, something I didn't like when Jones did it, nor do I like it now.

 

There was no way I could have giving Soto more than 3 rounds. He was outboxed silly. And he doesnt get mercy points from me either. You need to win rounds. He didnt.

 

:admin Are you saying Joan is not macho ENOUGH?atsch

Anyway, boxing is not fighting to prove who is more macho...it is the art of hitting without getting hit!:deal

I am disappointed with your attitude...

I won't debate on this subject with you anymore from now on...:good