Pacdbest Take on Soto-Guzman. I smell an Upset!!!!

Entirely not the point. Just say you were wrong and move on. You don't. You criticize the fighter who won. You did the same with Arce. Just rememeber this next time you tell me you have bragging rights AND when you use your Donaire prediction to make a point.

BTW, I told you before that Guzman had good whiskers. If you didn't put it in your analysis, that is a failure on your part. You think speed fighters can't take punches and are soft. I have noticed that trend in your breakdowns. It's not true.....

 

I may not be completely right but...



TOLD YOU SO!!! :yep:yep:yep:yep:yep:yep:yep:yep

 

I still give props to PacDBest for being man enough to make a thread and put in record his fight prediction. Not many forumers here can do what he is doing, me included. He is trying to wean away from Pacman and that is a very good start. His credibility will just increase the more he gives his fight predictions other than Pacman. Though his predictions should be accurate or close to it to for him to gain more credibility. :good

 

Pacdbest is the best here..

some pretends to have more knowledge..but they cannot back it up with details and predictions..

One thing people are good at is trying to find a way to counter argue PacD..and wait to jump in if PACd makes a wrong prediction...yet they make no points of their own

 

Right....because I didn't predict Guzman by UD over Soto. I just waited for him to be wrong. Oh wait.

I guess some of us DID make our own predictions and analysis

I gave him props for trying and even said he has a good track record. It's PacD who brings up his predictions to validate his other highly unlikely scenarios. He is the one who keeps his right choices in the limelight even when they have no place in the thread. It is only fair if he is going to brag (and make entire threads when he is right) that he takes his criticism when wrong. I would expect the same if I bragged on predictions I made.

 

But see he thinks it over..provides very detailed analysis..he had Guzman first and then he changed it ..explained why...he made a mistake but it was an honest one

 

He did give a detailed analysis, as did I. I didn't feel the need to go into as much detail as he did because for me the fight was simple and I knew Guzman's speed, despite Soto punching straighter, would make the difference. I also knew Guzman could take a punch, something PacD didn't take into account and seems to miss when it comes to slick fighters.

PacD's problem, as I said, is that he brags about his triumphs and using them as validation but doesn't like to own up to his mistakes. And when he makes a mistake, he doesn't admit to it, he makes excuses (like the Arce fight) AND he doesn't just simply give the other fighter props and move on. When I was wrong on Margarito-Williams, I made NO excuses, changed my avatar like I was supposed to and left it alone.

 

Go to the betting forum... Have a look who threw money on who. Thats where my analysis was. There for EVERYONE to see, just like PacDBest.

 

Kinda like you hijack other threads to tell everyone about Pacquiao? Or change everything into a comparison of him?

 

Lets review. I didn't call you stupid. Much of your postings are delusional. And you never gave Guzman his props, you only admitted you were wrong with caveats and excuses. It's not your only miss since August, you missed on Arce as well. And last but not least, your analysis are average, but detailed.

Why are they average? Because you fail to analyze everything. Here is what you do. You have a template pre-set for what a great fighter is. That template is Manny Pacquiao. Whichever fighters has attributes closest to that of Pacquiao is the fighter you pick to win. Simple as that...

As far as my being brave enough for anything, you CANNOT call me out to do something. I called you out to have a cordial public debate more than once and you backpeddaled and made excuses. No, I won't make my own personal thread to post my analysis. Each big fight has a thread made for that. I am not arrogant enough to post one specifically for myself. You only do so because you believe yourself to be some sort of visionary. You constantly brag about your predictions. You even had the nerve to ask if others were changing their prediction because you made yours as though you have some flawless track record.