With his aggresive style, caution last and one sided win from the scoring "I haven't seen the fight yet" does that make PacMan the Number #1 P4P? Or do you consider that Caution Frist, "hit and run" while trying to the least to win ****, the #1 p4p still?
Why would Pac move up for beating a fighter who (as great as he has been in his career) is clearly on the way out and who he already dominated years ago? If he's going to move up, he should do so after dominating some fresher competition.
Depends on How mayweather beats Hatton. If mayweather beats the crap out of him like I think he is untouchable p4p unless Cotto obliterates Shane...which would sky rocket Cottos status. Or vice versa if Shane obliterates Cotto he is back in the mix...There are some that would argue if Calzaghe slaps Kessler up which he will.......he should be #1 which is the likely scenario....NOT..lol
No one in the game relatively CLOSE to Mayweather. Imagine Mayweather and PAC @ 130. Both at their peaks..... Yes.... Mayweather TKO9 PAC :deal.
And who has pbf dominated, that was'nt past thier prime. When was last time he ever dominated a true champion at the peak of his career. Or faced a true opponent and walk him down with out running and pop-shot'n.
Since when do you have to walk someone down to beat them decisively? It's not #1 p4p in entertainment value, it's #1 p4p in difficulty to beat.
i'm beginning to lose respect for pacqiou, and not because of his fans. did u see him jerking off in the corner between rounds acting like a little child. and when barrera hit him on the break he cried like a little girl? i can't wait to see this chump get knocked.
Pac didn't BEAT anybody tonight. He got a decision that could have gone either way. Pac loses some credibility imo after this one. Should have been a draw.