pacman and the catch weight bs

:good
dabox, if you think the requirement of being the man in the division, is holding an alphabet trinket.... then thats part of the problem.

Do you know who the Ring Champion was? a title you actually have to earn and lose in the ring? It was Ricky Hatton, do you know who was ranked number one in the division by almost everyone especially after dominating malignaggi? Ricky Hatton.

Holts biggest win to date when Pac started looking at the 140lb division (which again, Hatton was the ring champ of, and number one in ranking, how this is even in question is complete revisionist history) was Ricardo Torres! and had just previously come off a split decision over demitrius hopkins i believe.... and Pac is going to go from fighting oscar to SKIPPING over hatton who just was the first to TKO Malignaggi, and fight Holt, a guy that was usually around 5th - 6th in ranking, who the Ring themselves had a 6?

Man, to me it seems your going a bit far to discredit the Pacman...

and Bradley? I have Bradley as the man in the division, no doubt, now that hatton has been knocked off. When hatton became the man at 140, he had never lost SINCE there at the weight.... i dont care if boxing politics for one reason or another strip so and so and let so and so fight for it, that dont mean ****. Bradley at the time Pac and Hatton began negotiations biggest win was his decision over junior witter..... again, Pac isnt going to go from fighting Hoya, then look at the jr welterweights and pick Bradley over Hatton, who was still considered the man, the biggest name in the division, never lost at the weight, and was the Ring Champion.


Now, do i personally think Bradley was a bit better then Hatton at that point in time? yes i do. But Hatton rightly had the number one spot and Bradley, although was next in line, in no way shape or form presented the more credible opponent at that period in time, then Hatton did. And to suggest such, in my opinion is just stretching a bit to try and discredit Pac.