Pacman fans are the worst( his nuthuggers)

wtf? just die.

 

no, i dont even like klitschko, im just proving a point. You realize you just sound dumber the more you reply. And you only reply to my posts that don't bury your boy in **** because i'm right.

 

we're down to one last nuthugger, domngo, who doesnt even mention Pac because all his points were shot down and he's left making stupid comments about nothing related to the post.

 

what else is new.

...but hey, where's all the hate coming from? why take away from pacman now? he won't lose any time soon. i won't bet against him.

 

Learn to read kid. I said Morales could barely make 130...then I said he could also barely make 135. No where did I say that he was better at 135.

The MAB trilogy took alot out of Morales and Barrera. Period, end of discussion. MAB couldn't make him kiss the canvas? So....MAB is not some dynamite puncher. So what was your point?

 

Nope didnt say that I said that Klitschko nuthuggers are far worse, yes you can state that a fading Morales beat Manny, TRUE, However he had to sneak in teh Winnings gloves in the contract to get it done, while at the same time take the fight with Pacquiao when he had all sorts of trouble going on behind the scenes, such as Murad ripping him off, new promoters left and right trying to sign the kid it was too much they barley found out about the gloves days before the fight, and beleive me that alone is really what made the difference in the fight, Had Manny used Reyes gloves Morales would have been on his ass.
Morales BTW only won the fight by a single round its not like he dominated Manny.

 

I pointed out he's the CONSENSUS best Heavy in the world.

A nuthugger is a FAN who regardless of legit critcism, ignores the criticism instead of using logic defending their fighter or accepting that more questions must be answered in the future to appropriately defend the criticism.

In your case, you are a Pac nutnugger. You're still on this thread resorting to random bull**** posts and are not logically defending your man-crush Pacman. He's fighting Barerra, coming off a loss. He fought Larios and Morales 1 coming off losses. Velasquez 42-10-2. Solis's opponent before Pac was 9-3. He couldn't beat Marquez after 3 1st round KD's. And Morales has proven shot, and if nothing else this thread has done, has proven Morales was shot after last MAB fight...and he still beat Pac once.

Keep huggin on them nuts, or accept he needs to beat Marquez and Guzman he regain credibility.

He ****ed his fans signed two contracts, and running for mayor. You guys should be pissed. But u keep on hugging...

 

nope, records stay the same. Its not black and white, historians reveal the elements of the bouts, the state of the fighters, and the significance of the fights. How long have u been a fan of this sport? and if it were all about records, why isn't MArciano the consensus #1 heavy of all time???? yep...you're an idiot. and a nuthugger....u wanted a definition, read back a page ur blind ass prolly missed it.

 

Try reading the conversation and you will see what context it is in.

Don't act like you are being objective....if you don't want these statements made then stop your Pinoy pals from saying that Morales was in his prime before the fight with Pacman.

It's always funny to watch you ask these questions ONLY to people in the thread who are not big supporters of Pacman.

 

Who has Marquez or Guzman really beat that can be considered on the same level as guys like Morales, and Barrera? Honestly who have those two really beat?
To be honest with you Manny did beat Marquez, one judge feel asleep at the wheel in that fight by not scoring the first round correctly that is a fact you cant even deny, but again I ask who did these two beat and what makes them so special that Manny must fight and beat them to get any credibility?

 

:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

he's the only nuthugger left...

 

who did:

SOLIS
VELASQUEZ
3K BATTERY
LARIOS

beat to fight pacquiao....LARIOS AND MORALES WERE COMING OFF LOSSES!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

So Larios and Morales were more accomplished that Guzman thats for sure, and he already fougth Marquez and beat him really so I dont see your point.
plus didnt Marquez fight with Barrera in a very very close fight even getting dropped by MAB? and after that he should get a shot at Manny P? get ****ing real

 

GUZMAN = undefeated, great defensive technique and footwork, soild pop in punches. Roach himself said he may be the biggest threat to Pac, and Pac aint ready for him.

MARQUEZ = HE DREW PAC AFTER BEING KD's 3 times!!!!!!!!! He outboxed him, and looks better than ever...AND HE BEAT BARERRA, WHO PAC IS FIGHTING INSTEAD!!!!!!