Pacman is more efficcient boxer than Mayweather

Irishbc · Jun 22, 2009

sweetray said: ↑

Hatton is smaller than Mayweather. It took 8 rounds for Mayweather to stop Hatton.
Pacman is smaller than Hatton. It took two rounds for pacman to stop Hatton.
Against DLH, Mayweather got a split decision victory while Pacman
dominated DLH completely and defeated him by TKO.

Pacman a small fighter who started boxing at 110 pounds, have proved that Mayweather`s accomplisment is nothing that can`t be surpassed by another good boxer. If DLH, Moseley and Trinidad, had stayed away from big opponents such as Hopkins, Roy Jones, winky Wright and others, they would have remained undefeated the way Mayweather is. In my opinion, Mayweather is a shame for boxing since he claims to be the best in boxing history while staying away from real challenges. His biggest challenge was against DLH. This fight was decided on a split decision. Later Mayweather backed out from a rematch after having called for it. It is hard for a boxer to gain respect when acting like a coward. Pacman is an example of a real warrior as opposed to Mayweather. Do you agree ?
Click to expand...

Mayweather couldn't KO Tony Pep, Hatton demolished him in four... What's your point?

Pacman is certainly not more efficient, efficient means expending the least amount of energy and risk for maximum reward and benefit...Who does that sound more like?

Log in or Sign up

Pacman is more efficcient boxer than Mayweather

Irishbc Well-Known Member Full Member

Log in or Sign up

Forums

Pacman is more efficcient boxer than Mayweather

Irishbc Well-Known Member Full Member