Pacman/JMM- my scorecard!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Pat$$$, Nov 15, 2011.


  1. Thomas!!

    Thomas!! Guest

    stop crying
     
  2. drunkboat

    drunkboat Active Member Full Member

    996
    1
    Aug 31, 2010
    The you're making the assumption that you are right and everybody else is wrong. If that makes you happy then keep it to yourself.
     
  3. weegriffin

    weegriffin Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,121
    22
    Aug 25, 2009
    Pacquaios face was beat up in the Clottey fight, it doesn't show who won the fight does it?
     
  4. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    i'm not a fan of jmm. i actually like pac far far more.

    doesn't make what happened right.

    & btw bravo on falling back on the classic internet strawman. if someone disagrees with you: they are a fanboy in denial.


    again...no sound points of your own. top quality posting.

    btw. a majority of people on here...& a majority of profession boxers...& a majority of professional boxing journalists: seem to believe that jmm won & was robbed.

    did you point out to the op that as he disagrees with the majority he is clearly wrong? or did you save that little beauty for me? :huh
     
  5. timeout

    timeout Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,718
    3,533
    Jun 15, 2010
    U scored it right bro
    115-113 PAC.
     
  6. Anima

    Anima Kinetic Link Full Member

    6,205
    438
    Nov 12, 2010
    One thing I didn't like was the corner of Marquez telling him he is winning. As the challenger he should've pushed more. He practically gave the last round to Pac.
    Although he won in my eyes, that should've helped.
     
  7. Windigo

    Windigo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    3
    Jun 22, 2009
    The aggressor who came forward and controlled the ring. No risk no reward. Quit crying professional boxing is scored the way its scored. You want the rules changed because you are butthurt.
     
  8. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    a) quit crying? i'm not crying. you are clearly a pac fanboy tho. :good

    b) yes. & you don't understand how it's supposed to be scored.
     
  9. Cableaddict

    Cableaddict Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,705
    292
    Jun 15, 2011
    JMM won round 12 easily. Manny landed three whole punches. (use your eyes, don't cite the totally BS compubox numbers)
    Even one of the corrupt judges gave JMM round 12.

    I also thought JMM clearly won round 10. Punching air should not be counted as hits for Manny. He looked like a fool in there.
     
  10. Jordan_Davies

    Jordan_Davies Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,502
    0
    Jul 28, 2011
    I scored the fight 116-112 Marquez, if i could rewatch the fight on something that doesnt freeze every 2 seconds ill rescore it but until then i will go with my initial result
     
  11. drunkboat

    drunkboat Active Member Full Member

    996
    1
    Aug 31, 2010
    This content is protected
     
  12. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    i'm old enough to remember when that meme was funny. :roll:
     
  13. Windigo

    Windigo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,131
    3
    Jun 22, 2009
    Who had JMM up by 1 after 9.

    Enlighten us then. How exactly does an even round end up in JMM favor.
     
  14. ploys

    ploys New Member Full Member

    1
    0
    Mar 5, 2011
    tbh...i find that laughable.

    landing the better cleaner harder punches particularly to the body. defending better with his movement, slipping shots & catching a lot of pac's offence on his gloves (have people forgotten you do actually score defence? oh no...pac threw more...he won...duh...)

    as i've said before...i don't like jmm. i actually like pac a lot & think he's a warrior & a credit to the sport. that doesn't change what happened. you have to respect styles, not just say the guy who threw more won the rd. boxing scoring doesn't work like that. "throwing more" isn't a criteria. "aggression" isn't a criteria. & even if it was...pac was only marginally more active anyway.
     
  15. Pat$$$

    Pat$$$ Active Member Full Member

    902
    0
    May 22, 2011
    This^^^... in a close round with a low punch output, the round must go to the agressor- i.e., the one that is moving forward and cutting off the ring!